82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9349902)
1. Subjective breast cancer grading. Analyses of reproducibility after application of Bayesian belief networks.
Kronqvist P; Montironi R; Kuopio T; Collan YU
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 9349902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of uncertainty in breast cancer grading with Bayesian belief networks.
Kronqvist P; Montironi R; Collan YU; Bartels PH; Thompson D
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1995 Oct; 17(5):300-8. PubMed ID: 8534332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving inter-observer agreement and certainty level in diagnosing and grading papillary urothelial neoplasms: usefulness of a Bayesian belief network.
Montironi R; Mazzucchelli R; Colanzi P; Streccioni M; Scarpelli M; Thompson D; Bartels PH
Eur Urol; 2002 Apr; 41(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 12074818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histopathological grading of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: validation of a web-based survey through intra-observer reproducibility analysis.
Schuh F; Biazús JV; Resetkova E; Benfica CZ; Ventura Ade F; Uchoa D; Graudenz M; Edelweiss MI
Diagn Pathol; 2015 Jul; 10():93. PubMed ID: 26159429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical applications of Bayesian belief networks in pathology.
Hamilton PW; Montironi R; Abmayr W; Bibbo M; Anderson N; Thompson D; Bartels PH
Pathologica; 1995 Jun; 87(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 8570284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
Frierson HF; Wolber RA; Berean KW; Franquemont DW; Gaffey MJ; Boyd JC; Wilbur DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 7856562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver agreement of the Nottingham histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma breast.
Sikka M; Agarwal S; Bhatia A
Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):149-53. PubMed ID: 10921219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Qualitative and quantitative histopathology in transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder. An international investigation of intra- and interobserver reproducibility.
Sørensen FB; Sasaki M; Fukuzawa S; Yamabe H; Olsen S; Yoshida O
Lab Invest; 1994 Feb; 70(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 8139265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histologic grading of breast cancer: linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement.
Dalton LW; Pinder SE; Elston CE; Ellis IO; Page DL; Dupont WD; Blamey RW
Mod Pathol; 2000 Jul; 13(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 10912931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver variation in breast cancer grading: a statistical modeling approach.
Chowdhury N; Pai MR; Lobo FD; Kini H; Varghese R
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2006 Aug; 28(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 16927641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver reproducibility of immunocytochemical estrogen- and progesterone receptor status assessment in breast cancer.
Biesterfeld S; Veuskens U; Schmitz FJ; Amo-Takyi B; Böcking A
Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(5A):2497-500. PubMed ID: 8917341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficacy and limitations of repeated slide conferences for improving interobserver agreement when judging nuclear atypia of breast cancer. The Japan National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC) Pathology Section.
Tsuda H; Akiyama F; Kurosumi M; Sakamoto G; Watanabe T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1999 Feb; 29(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 10089946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study.
Dalton LW; Page DL; Dupont WD
Cancer; 1994 Jun; 73(11):2765-70. PubMed ID: 8194018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) suggests four or more observers for a reliable assessment of the consistency of histological grading of invasive breast carcinoma: A reproducibility study with a retrospective view on previous studies.
Cserni B; Bori R; Csörgő E; Oláh-Németh O; Pancsa T; Sejben A; Sejben I; Vörös A; Zombori T; Nyári T; Cserni G
Pathol Res Pract; 2022 Jan; 229():153718. PubMed ID: 34920295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expert system support using a Bayesian belief network for the classification of endometrial hyperplasia.
Morrison ML; McCluggage WG; Price GJ; Diamond J; Sheeran MR; Mulholland KM; Walsh MY; Montironi R; Bartels PH; Thompson D; Hamilton PW
J Pathol; 2002 Jul; 197(3):403-14. PubMed ID: 12115888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual assessment of Ki67 using a 5-grade scale (Eye-5) is easy and practical to classify breast cancer subtypes with high reproducibility.
Hida AI; Bando K; Sugita A; Maeda T; Ueda N; Matsukage S; Nakanishi M; Kito K; Miyazaki T; Ohtsuki Y; Oshiro Y; Inoue H; Kawaguchi H; Yamashita N; Aogi K; Moriya T
J Clin Pathol; 2015 May; 68(5):356-61. PubMed ID: 25673730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided classification of breast cancer nuclei.
Schnorrenberg F; Pattichis CS; Schizas CN; Kyriacou K; Vassiliou M
Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):147-61. PubMed ID: 8885093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing best-practice Bayesian Belief Networks in ecological risk assessments for freshwater and estuarine ecosystems: a quantitative review.
McDonald KS; Ryder DS; Tighe M
J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():190-200. PubMed ID: 25733196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of three classification systems of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using a web-based survey.
Schuh F; Biazús JV; Resetkova E; Benfica CZ; Edelweiss MI
Pathol Res Pract; 2010 Oct; 206(10):705-11. PubMed ID: 20663616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Reproducibility of Her-2/neu overexpression with HERCEP test in invasive ductal breast cancer].
Rodríguez Moguel L; Vega Ramos B
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2002 Dec; 70():601-6. PubMed ID: 12661333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
