These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9349967)

  • 1. The reaction to nailing or cementing of the femur in rats. A microangiographic and fluorescence study.
    Pazzaglia UE; Andrini L; Di Nucci A
    Int Orthop; 1997; 21(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 9349967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Periosteal and endosteal reaction to reaming and nailing: the possible role of revascularization on the endosteal anchorage of cementless stems.
    Pazzaglia UE
    Biomaterials; 1996 May; 17(10):1009-14. PubMed ID: 8736736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical effects of reaming and implantation of acrylic cement into the medullary cavity of bones.
    Reikerås O
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978); 1984; 103(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 6477071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alterations in bone remodeling in the femur after medullary reaming and cemented hip arthroplasty in dogs.
    VanEnkevort BA; Markel MD; Manley PA
    Am J Vet Res; 1999 Aug; 60(8):922-8. PubMed ID: 10451197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in femoral cortical porosity after reaming and intramedullary canal preparation in a canine model.
    Syed KA; Kuzyk PR; Yoo DJ; Zdero R; Richards RR; Schemitsch EH
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):368-73. PubMed ID: 22552219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model of the intracortical vascular system of long bones and of its organization: an experimental study in rabbit femur and tibia.
    Pazzaglia UE; Bonaspetti G; Ranchetti F; Bettinsoli P
    J Anat; 2008 Aug; 213(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 19172733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Microangiographic and histologic findings in the tibiae of rats after implantation of bone cement (author's transl)].
    Siebert H; Konold P; Eberhardt B; Pannike A
    Chir Forum Exp Klin Forsch; 1980; ():11-5. PubMed ID: 7389445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Extensometry and primary anchorage of femur implants. Study of the upper metaphyseal intracortical support of the B.P.R cement-less implant].
    Delecrin J; Passuti N; Royer J; Rogez JM; Bainvel JV
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1989; 55(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 2801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remodelling of bone around intramedullary stems in growing patients.
    Blunn GW; Wait ME
    J Orthop Res; 1991 Nov; 9(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 1919843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vascular and structural changes in rat femora following nailing and intramedullary occlusion.
    Grundnes O; Gjerdet NR; Utvåg SE; Reikerås O
    J Orthop Res; 1998 May; 16(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 9671923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Anatomic basis of the cemented femur shaft. A comparative study of straight and anatomic design].
    Breusch SJ; Draenert Y; Draenert K
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 10036745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application of an amphiphilic bonder in a goat model to increase the femoral cement-bone adhesion in cemented hip arthroplasty].
    Müller-Rath R; Wirtz D; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17912668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental reaming of the proximal femur and acrylic cement implantation: vascular and histologic effects.
    Rhinelander FW; Nelson CL; Stewart RD; Stewart CL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1979 Jun; (141):74-89. PubMed ID: 383344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo implant fixation of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model.
    Nakahara I; Takao M; Bandoh S; Bertollo N; Walsh WR; Sugano N
    J Orthop Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 23097319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Bony ongrowth on the surface of HA-coated femoral implants: an x-ray analysis].
    Zweymüller KA
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2012 Feb; 150(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 22009584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of femoral strains with cementless proximal-fill femoral implants of varied stem length.
    Arno S; Fetto J; Nguyen NQ; Kinariwala N; Takemoto R; Oh C; Walker PS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 22503474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Periosteal microvascular reorganization after tibial reaming and intramedullary nailing in rats.
    Greksa F; Tóth K; Boros M; Szabó A
    J Orthop Sci; 2012 Jul; 17(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 22476427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The influence of bone cement on the bone].
    Sato T
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 Nov; 56(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 7161548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.