BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

33 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9351211)

  • 1. A rapid, sensitive and automated method for detection of Salmonella species in foods using AG-9600 AmpliSensor Analyzer.
    Chen S; Yee A; Griffiths M; Wu KY; Wang CN; Rahn K; De Grandis SA
    J Appl Microbiol; 1997 Sep; 83(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 9351211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples.
    Feder I; Nietfeld JC; Galland J; Yeary T; Sargeant JM; Oberst R; Tamplin ML; Luchansky JB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2477-84. PubMed ID: 11427557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a closed-tube, calcein-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay to detect Salmonella spp. in raw meat samples.
    Balaga KB; Pavon RDN; Calayag AMB; Justo CAC; Adao DEV; Rivera WL
    J Microbiol Methods; 2024 May; 220():106922. PubMed ID: 38513919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of Salmonella enterica in Meat in Less than 5 Hours by a Low-Cost and Noncomplex Sample Preparation Method.
    Fachmann MSR; Löfström C; Hoorfar J; Hansen F; Christensen J; Mansdal S; Josefsen MH
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 83(5):. PubMed ID: 27986726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of Salmonella typhimurium in retail chicken meat and chicken giblets.
    El-Aziz DM
    Asian Pac J Trop Biomed; 2013 Sep; 3(9):678-81. PubMed ID: 23998006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Next day Salmonella spp. detection method based on real-time PCR for meat, dairy and vegetable food products.
    Rodriguez-Lazaro D; Gonzalez-García P; Delibato E; De Medici D; García-Gimeno RM; Valero A; Hernandez M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 184():113-20. PubMed ID: 24713474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved template preparation for PCR-based assays for detection of food-borne bacterial pathogens.
    Lampel KA; Orlandi PA; Kornegay L
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2000 Oct; 66(10):4539-42. PubMed ID: 11010913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid detection of Salmonella typhimurium by photonic PCR-LFIS dual mode visualization.
    Gao J; Jiao Y; Zhou J; Zhang H
    Talanta; 2024 Apr; 270():125553. PubMed ID: 38128283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of PCR, electrochemical enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and the standard culture method for detecting salmonella in meat products.
    Croci L; Delibato E; Volpe G; De Medici D; Palleschi G
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2004 Mar; 70(3):1393-6. PubMed ID: 15006758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Independent evaluation of a DNA microarray system for Salmonella detection in ground beef.
    Delgado E; Katchman B; Stice S; Calle A
    Food Microbiol; 2024 Apr; 118():104406. PubMed ID: 38049268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and sensitivity of commercial PCR-based methods for detection of Salmonella enterica in feed.
    Koyuncu S; Andersson MG; Häggblom P
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 May; 76(9):2815-22. PubMed ID: 20228106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitive Immunochromatographic Determination of
    Hendrickson OD; Byzova NA; Safenkova IV; Panferov VG; Dzantiev BB; Zherdev AV
    Nanomaterials (Basel); 2023 Dec; 13(23):. PubMed ID: 38063770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved sample treatment protocol for accurate detection of live Salmonella spp. in food samples by viability PCR.
    Dinh Thanh M; Agustí G; Mader A; Appel B; Codony F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189302. PubMed ID: 29232387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Culture versus PCR for Salmonella Species Identification in Some Dairy Products and Dairy Handlers with Special Concern to Its Zoonotic Importance.
    Gwida MM; Al-Ashmawy MA
    Vet Med Int; 2014; 2014():502370. PubMed ID: 24808971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid detection of
    Jiao Y; Zhang Z; Wang K; Zhang H; Gao J
    Food Chem X; 2023 Oct; 19():100798. PubMed ID: 37780326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new microfluidic approach for the one-step capture, amplification and label-free quantification of bacteria from raw samples.
    Pereiro I; Bendali A; Tabnaoui S; Alexandre L; Srbova J; Bilkova Z; Deegan S; Joshi L; Viovy JL; Malaquin L; Dupuy B; Descroix S
    Chem Sci; 2017 Feb; 8(2):1329-1336. PubMed ID: 28626552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of
    Dawood Saleem H; Fawwaz Alfarras A; Hameed NM; Hasan Al-Zubaidi S; Shnain Ali M; Hamood SA; Hameed S; Hamad DA; Ali Hussein H; Mohsin Al-Dhalemi D
    Arch Razi Inst; 2022 Aug; 77(4):1453-1457. PubMed ID: 36883154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of salmonellae in chicken feces by a combination of tetrathionate broth enrichment, capillary PCR, and capillary gel electrophoresis.
    Carli KT; Unal CB; Caner V; Eyigor A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1871-6. PubMed ID: 11326006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An automated fluorescent PCR method for detection of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in foods.
    Chen S; Xu R; Yee A; Wu KY; Wang CN; Read S; De Grandis SA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 64(11):4210-6. PubMed ID: 9797267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.