These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9351750)

  • 1. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage.
    Tate KM; Strickland JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):715-7. PubMed ID: 9351750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
    Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review.
    Mitric C; Lakabi R; Kligun G; Matanes E; Lau S; Gotlieb WH; Salvador S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2162866. PubMed ID: 36689210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
    P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of endocervical curettage and endocervical brushing.
    Klam S; Arseneau J; Mansour N; Franco E; Ferenczy A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 96(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 10862849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The utility of endocervical curettage: does routine ECC at the time of colposcopy for low-grade cytologic abnormalities improve diagnosis of high-grade disease?
    Rose JD; Byun SY; Sims SM; Davis JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):530.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22541611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical significance of endocervical curettage (ECC) in predicting neoplastic lesions of the cervix].
    Toki T; Fujii S; Yajima A
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Mar; 46(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8133138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical evaluation of the endocervical curettage.
    Spirtos NM; Schlaerth JB; d'Ablaing G; Morrow CP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 3658281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM; Javaheri G
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Linasmita V; Bullangpoti S; Rochanawutanon M; Bhamarapravati Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1990 Feb; 73 Suppl 1():28-32. PubMed ID: 2351911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RO-TAGE biopsy. An improved method of endocervical evaluation.
    Mann WJ; Chumas J; Rochelson B; Funt M; Westermann C
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):376-8. PubMed ID: 4009558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage.
    Townsend DE; Ostergard DR; Mishell DR; Hirose FM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Oct; 108(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 5484600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of two endocervical sampling method: randomized controlled trial.
    Goksedef BP; Api M; Kaya O; Gorgen H; Tarlaci A; Cetin A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 22948805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endocervical curettage: does it contribute to the management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology?
    Oyer R; Hanjani P
    Gynecol Oncol; 1986 Oct; 25(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 3758830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette.
    Boardman LA; Meinz H; Steinhoff MM; Heber WW; Blume J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 12636943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adequacy in Endocervical Curettage.
    Alqabbani R; Chan J; Goldberg A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2022 Sep; 158(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 35568991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.