469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9351765)
21. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
Katz VL; Farmer RM; Dean CA; Carpenter ME
South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The use of low dose 1.5 mg prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labor at term with unfavorable cervix.
Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P
J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Nov; 78(11):590-5. PubMed ID: 8576669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices.
Rouben D; Arias F
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 8336880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D; Young DC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 15280123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening in patients with an indication for delivery.
Darroca RJ; Buttino L; Miller J; Khamis HJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 8559529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pre-induction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 gel: intracervical versus intravaginal route.
Zanini A; Ghidini A; Norchi S; Beretta E; Cortinovis I; Bottino S
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):681-3. PubMed ID: 2216204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Prediction of successful induction of labor: a comparison between fetal fibronectin assay and the Bishop score].
Droulez A; Girard R; Dumas AM; Mathian B; Berland M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Nov; 37(7):691-6. PubMed ID: 18602765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppositories.
Buchanan D; Macer J; Yonekura ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 6585733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 at preterm.
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Hadar E; Hod M; Ben-Haroush A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 18158629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
Greybush M; Singleton C; Atlas RO; Balducci J; Rust OA
J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing two dinoprostone agents for preinduction cervical ripening at term. A randomized trial.
Wieland D; Friedman F
J Reprod Med; 1999 Aug; 44(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 10483544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of glyceryl trinitrate, misoprostol, and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening in term pregnancy.
Sharma Y; Kumar S; Mittal S; Misra R; Dadhwal V
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Jun; 31(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 15916656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Current practice and results of labor induction].
Csorba R; Aranyosi J; Juhász G; Zatik J; Major T
Orv Hetil; 2003 Oct; 144(40):1977-80. PubMed ID: 14626639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
