These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9351765)

  • 41. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
    Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cervical ripening with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel.
    Prins RP; Bolton RN; Mark C; Neilson DR; Watson P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 6572335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Scandroglio S; Colombo G; Bolis P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Combining medical and mechanical methods of cervical ripening. Does it increase the likelihood of successful induction of labor?
    Sullivan CA; Benton LW; Roach H; Smith LG; Martin RW; Morrison JC
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):823-8. PubMed ID: 8951132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 12388961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Obesity and cervical ripening failure risk.
    Gauthier T; Mazeau S; Dalmay F; Eyraud JL; Catalan C; Marin B; Aubard Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Mar; 25(3):304-7. PubMed ID: 21574901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term.
    Ducarme G; Berthommier L; Planche L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):934-941. PubMed ID: 36426906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Factors predicting unsuccessful labor induction with dinoprostone in post-term pregnancy with unfavorable cervix].
    Ducarme G; Chesnoy V; Petit L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Jan; 44(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 24239036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Cervical ripening at term with repeated administration of dinoprostone vaginal pessary].
    Petrovic Barbitch M; Gnisci A; Marcelli M; Capelle M; Guidicelli B; Cravello L; Gamerre M; Agostini A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Jun; 41(6):346-50. PubMed ID: 23562543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Role of prostaglandin-induced cervical changes in labor induction.
    Jagani N; Schulman H; Fleischer A; Mitchell J; Blattner P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 6582419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Induction of labor and cervical ripening by intracervical prostaglandin E2.
    Sørensen SS; Brocks V; Lenstrup C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 65(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 3880877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score.
    Gonen R; Degani S; Ron A
    Eur J Ultrasound; 1998 Aug; 7(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 9700213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cervical ripening: a randomized study comparing prostaglandin E2 gel to prostaglandin E2 suppositories.
    Perryman D; Yeast JD; Holst V
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 May; 79(5 ( Pt 1)):670-2. PubMed ID: 1565347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pre-cervical ripening and hygroscopic cervical dilators in pre-labor induction.
    D'Indinosante M; Vidiri A; Giorgi L; Turrini I; Spanò A; Perelli F; Scatena E; Mattei A; Lanzone A; Scambia G; Cavaliere A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(2):2239422. PubMed ID: 37574214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cervical ripening. A retrospective experience with prostaglandin E2 "chips".
    Smith CV; Eglinton GS
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):388-90. PubMed ID: 2352231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil.
    Chyu JK; Strassner HT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):606-11. PubMed ID: 9322631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate.
    Lee DS; Tandel MD; Kwan L; Francoeur AA; Duong HL; Negi M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100534. PubMed ID: 34808400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.