These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9353109)

  • 1. NIH pilots faster feedback for grant resubmissions.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6654):898. PubMed ID: 9353109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century.
    Baldwin W; McCardle P
    Physiologist; 1997 Jun; 40(3):89, 91-3. PubMed ID: 9230629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NIH panel to monitor peer review in action.
    Taylor R
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6531):438. PubMed ID: 7777040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Varmus speaks out on need to boost clinical research.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):118. PubMed ID: 7969431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH streamlines research grants process.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Jul; 394(6691):306. PubMed ID: 9690459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
    Nairn RS; Sweasy JB
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH needs a makeover.
    Dey SK
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restructuring the NIH.
    Thier SO
    N Engl J Med; 1994 May; 330(21):1528-30. PubMed ID: 8164708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What do Public Health Service agencies do with grant proposals?
    Willette RE
    Am J Pharm Educ; 1977 Nov; 41(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 10313840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why China needs an NIH.
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):679. PubMed ID: 15085093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH firm on grant application rules.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7340):558. PubMed ID: 21455147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What does a study section look for in evaluating a grant proposal?
    Buckley JP
    Am J Pharm Educ; 1977 Nov; 41(4):381-2. PubMed ID: 10236661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH funding reform.
    Strauss JF
    Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):851. PubMed ID: 16081700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review: NIH urged to streamline bids..
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6486):170-1. PubMed ID: 8028655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The national institute of biomedical imaging and bioengineering and the extramural funding of imaging research.
    Wallner PE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):87-8. PubMed ID: 17411531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.