These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9353436)

  • 1. Transrectal sonography in staging rectal carcinoma: the role of gray-scale, color-flow, and Doppler imaging analysis.
    Heneghan JP; Salem RR; Lange RC; Taylor KJ; Hammers LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1247-52. PubMed ID: 9353436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.
    Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Hugol D; Hassen K; Sciot C; Truc JB; Poitout P; Vadrot D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Differential diagnosis of axillary lymph nodes: Usefulness of gray-scale and color-power doppler sonography].
    Ekşioğlu AS; Ozdemir A; Ozdemir H
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Dec; 9(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 14730954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
    Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endorectal color Doppler imaging of primary and recurrent rectal wall tumors: preliminary experience.
    Sudakoff GS; Gasparaitis A; Michelassi F; Hurst R; Hoffmann K; Hackworth C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 8571905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
    Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of transrectal sonography and double-contrast MR imaging when staging rectal cancer.
    Fuchsjäger MH; Maier AG; Schima W; Zebedin E; Herbst F; Mittlböck M; Wrba F; Lechner GL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):421-7. PubMed ID: 12876020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
    Salem S; White LM; Lai J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biplane transrectal ultrasonography plus ultrasonic elastosonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in T staging of rectal cancer.
    Feng Y; Peng C; Zhu Y; Liu L
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):862. PubMed ID: 32894078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Color and pulsed Doppler sonography, gray-scale imaging, and serum CA 125 in the assessment of adnexal disease.
    Predanic M; Vlahos N; Pennisi JA; Moukhtar M; Aleem FA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 88(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 8692517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
    Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
    Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined modality staging of low risk rectal cancer.
    Barbaro B; Savastano M; Sallustio G
    Rays; 1995; 20(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 7480863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes.
    Yang WT; Chang J; Metreweli C
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):568-73. PubMed ID: 10796941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical value of radial endorectal ultrasound in the assessment of preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma].
    Zhu J; Huang PT; Ding KF; Zhang X; Liu CM; Liu XM; Li BZ; Cai SR; Zheng S
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 35(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 23714673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Color velocity imaging and power Doppler sonography of the gallbladder wall: a new look at sonographic diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.
    Soyer P; Brouland JP; Boudiaf M; Kardache M; Pelage JP; Panis Y; Valleur P; Rymer R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 9648785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-Energy CT of Rectal Cancer Specimens: A CT-based Method for Mesorectal Lymph Node Characterization.
    Al-Najami I; Beets-Tan RG; Madsen G; Baatrup G
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):640-7. PubMed ID: 27270516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.
    Na DG; Lim HK; Byun HS; Kim HD; Ko YH; Baek JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of TRUS in the staging of rectal carcinoma before and after radiotherapy and comparison with the staging postoperative pathology.
    Xu D; Ju HX; Qian CW; Jiang F
    Clin Radiol; 2014 May; 69(5):481-4. PubMed ID: 24517911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rectal cancer: CT local staging with histopathologic correlation.
    Chiesura-Corona M; Muzzio PC; Giust G; Zuliani M; Pucciarelli S; Toppan P
    Abdom Imaging; 2001; 26(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 11178688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of endorectal ultrasound in the assessment of adenomas, T1- and T2-carcinomas.
    Sailer M; Leppert R; Kraemer M; Fuchs KH; Thiede A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 1997; 12(4):214-9. PubMed ID: 9272450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.