1163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9353469)
21. [T2-dependent sequences in the study of hepatic focal lesions: comparison of the conventional spin echo sequence and the 0.5 T fast spin echo].
Manfredi R; Maresca G; Tartaglione T; Scarano E; Marano P
Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 8975308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery BLADE magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: an alternative to spin-echo technique for detection of brain lesions in the unsedated pediatric patient?
Alibek S; Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Stemmer A; Anders K; Kramer M; Bautz W; Staatz G
Acad Radiol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):986-95. PubMed ID: 18620119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MR imaging of diseases of the brain: comparison of GRASE and conventional spin-echo T2-weighted pulse sequences.
Patel MR; Klufas RA; Shapiro AW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):963-6. PubMed ID: 7677002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Motion suppression in MR imaging of the liver: comparison of respiratory-triggered and nontriggered fast spin-echo sequences.
Low RN; Alzate GD; Shimakawa A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 8976950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast enhancement of intracranial lesions: conventional T1-weighted spin-echo versus fast spin-echo MR imaging techniques.
Sugahara T; Korogi Y; Ge Y; Shigematsu Y; Liang L; Yoshizumi K; Kitajima M; Takahashi M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1999 Sep; 20(8):1554-9. PubMed ID: 10512245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lung MRI at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: observer preference study and lesion contrast using five different pulse sequences.
Fink C; Puderbach M; Biederer J; Fabel M; Dietrich O; Kauczor HU; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 17507808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radial fast spin-echo method for T2-weighted imaging and T2 mapping of the liver.
Altbach MI; Outwater EK; Trouard TP; Krupinski EA; Theilmann RJ; Stopeck AT; Kono M; Gmitro AF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 12203766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted fast spin-echo contrast-enhanced imaging: a comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions.
Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Athyal RP; Rudwan M; Khafajee S
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 19695043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence with navigator triggered prospective acquisition correction.
Klessen C; Asbach P; Kroencke TJ; Fischer T; Warmuth C; Stemmer A; Hamm B; Taupitz M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 15834908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MR imaging of the liver: comparison between single-shot echo-planar and half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences.
Yamashita Y; Tang Y; Namimoto T; Mitsuzaki K; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 9577477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Single breath-hold T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver: value of single-shot fast spin-echo and multishot spin-echo echoplanar imaging.
Hori M; Murakami T; Kim T; Kanematsu M; Tsuda K; Takahashi S; Takamura M; Hoshi H; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1423-31. PubMed ID: 10789807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.
Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC
Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Phased-array superficial coil and breath holding technique in MRI of the liver. Comparison of conventional spin echo sequences with rapid fat suppressing gradient echo and turbo-spin sequences].
Helmberger T; Holzknecht N; Lackerbauer CA; Müller-Lisse U; Schnarkowski P; Gauger J; Reiser M
Radiologe; 1995 Dec; 35(12):919-24. PubMed ID: 8584635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of HASTE with multiple signal averaging versus conventional turbo spin echo sequence: a new option for T2-weighted MRI of the female pelvis.
Tsuboyama T; Takei O; Okada A; Honda T; Kuriyama K
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3245-3253. PubMed ID: 32064558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Liver masses: replacement of conventional T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging with breath-hold MR imaging.
Gaa J; Hatabu H; Jenkins RL; Finn JP; Edelman RR
Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 8685342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of conventional fast spin echo, single-shot two-dimensional and three-dimensional half-fourier RARE for T2-weighted female pelvic imaging.
Sugimura H; Yamaguchi K; Furukoji E; Tamura S; Sakae T; Koga H; Machida Y; Kitane S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Mar; 19(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 14994304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. T2-weighted breathold imaging of the liver: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of fast spin echo and half Fourier single shot fast spin echo imaging.
Helmberger TK; Schröder J; Holzknecht N; Gregor M; Heuck A; Petsch R; Reiser MF
MAGMA; 1999 Oct; 9(1-2):42-51. PubMed ID: 10555172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared-rapid gradient-echo and two-dimensional spin-echo sequences.
Barentsz JO; Jager G; Mugler JP; Oosterhof G; Peters H; van Erning LT; Ruijs SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7998522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Deep learning HASTE sequence compared with T2-weighted BLADE sequence for liver MRI at 3 Tesla: a qualitative and quantitative prospective study.
Wary P; Hossu G; Ambarki K; Nickel D; Arberet S; Oster J; Orry X; Laurent V
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):6817-6827. PubMed ID: 37188883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
