These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9354251)

  • 1. The use of noncontingent reinforcement and contingent restraint to reduce physical aggression and self-injurious behaviour in a traumatically brain injured adult.
    Persel CS; Persel CH; Ashley MJ; Krych DK
    Brain Inj; 1997 Oct; 11(10):751-60. PubMed ID: 9354251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Restraint fading and the development of alternative behaviour in the treatment of self-restraint and self-injury.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Smith RG; Vollmer TR
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 1994 Apr; 38 ( Pt 2)():135-48. PubMed ID: 8193450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint.
    Derby KM; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 8881350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Vollmer TR; Iwata BA; Zarcone JR; Smith RG; Mazaleski JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 8473262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the relationship between self-injurious behavior and self-restraint.
    Smith RG; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Pace GM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(2):433-45. PubMed ID: 1634431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-restraint as positive reinforcement for self-injurious behavior.
    Smith RG; Lerman DC; Iwata BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 8881348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition.
    Goh HL; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 10885527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further analysis of the relationship between self-injury and self-restraint.
    Fisher WW; Grace NC; Murphy C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 8881349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of self-restraint using a functional analysis of self-injury.
    Scheithauer M; O'Connor J; Toby LM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):907-11. PubMed ID: 26223787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of procedures for programming noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Wallace MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 10885529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as treatment for self-injurious behavior.
    Fischer SM; Iwata BA; Mazaleski JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 9210304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations.
    Lalli JS; Casey SD; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PubMed ID: 9103988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; Thompson RH; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 11214020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noncontingent reinforcement: effects of satiation versus choice responding.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; DeLeon IG; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE; Rodriguez-Catter V; Adelinis JD
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(6):411-27. PubMed ID: 10641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of self-injurious behavior maintained by access to self-restraint materials.
    Vollmer TR; Vorndran CM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):647-50. PubMed ID: 9891400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior.
    Fisher WW; O'Connor JT; Kurtz PF; DeLeon IG; Gotjen DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 10738954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antecedent analysis of therapeutic restraint in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury: a descriptive study of four cases.
    Luiselli JK; Pace GM; Dunn EK
    Brain Inj; 2003 Mar; 17(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 12623502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional analysis of self-injurious behavior and its relation to self-restraint.
    Rooker GW; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 16463534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of physical restraint on self-injurious behaviour.
    Singh NN; Dawson MJ; Manning PJ
    J Ment Defic Res; 1981 Sep; 25(Pt 3):207-16. PubMed ID: 7277481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment of self-injurious behaviour by differential reinforcement and physical restraint.
    Jena SP
    Int J Rehabil Res; 1999 Sep; 22(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 10839680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.