These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9354494)

  • 1. Changes in impairment and disability from the third to the sixth month after stroke and its relationship evaluated by an artificial neural network.
    Sonoda S; Chino N; Domen K; Saitoh E
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1997; 76(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 9354494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impairment and disability: their relation during stroke rehabilitation.
    Roth EJ; Heinemann AW; Lovell LL; Harvey RL; McGuire JR; Diaz S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Mar; 79(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 9523787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure.
    Granger CV; Hamilton BB; Linacre JM; Heinemann AW; Wright BD
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Apr; 72(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 8476548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation.
    Chae J; Johnston M; Kim H; Zorowitz R
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1995; 74(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 7779333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural network modeling accurately predicts the functional outcome of stroke survivors with moderate disabilities.
    Oczkowski WJ; Barreca S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Apr; 78(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 9111450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between physical impairment and disability during stroke rehabilitation: effect of cognitive status.
    Nas K; Gür A; Cevik R; Saraç AJ
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2004 Sep; 27(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 15319687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships between independence level of single motor-FIM items and FIM-motor scores in patients with hemiplegia after stroke: an ordinal logistic modelling study.
    Koyama T; Matsumoto K; Okuno T; Domen K
    J Rehabil Med; 2006 Sep; 38(5):280-6. PubMed ID: 16931457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four methods for characterizing disability in the formation of function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Hamilton BB; Granger CV; Goin JE; Escarce JJ; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Dec; 75(12):1277-83. PubMed ID: 7993164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome.
    Franchignoni FP; Tesio L; Ricupero C; Martino MT
    Stroke; 1997 Jul; 28(7):1382-5. PubMed ID: 9227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric properties of the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS).
    Liu M; Chino N; Tuji T; Masakado Y; Hase K; Kimura A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2002 Dec; 16(4):339-51. PubMed ID: 12462765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting discharge destination of stroke patients using a mathematical model based on six items from the Functional Independence Measure.
    Mauthe RW; Haaf DC; Hayn P; Krall JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Jan; 77(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 8554464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure.
    Heinemann AW; Linacre JM; Wright BD; Hamilton BB; Granger C
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Jun; 74(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 8503745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential item functioning of the Functional Independence Measure in higher performing neurological patients.
    Dallmeijer AJ; Dekker J; Roorda LD; Knol DL; van Baalen B; de Groot V; Schepers VP; Lankhorst GJ
    J Rehabil Med; 2005 Nov; 37(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 16287665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional outcome after brain tumor and acute stroke: a comparative analysis.
    Huang ME; Cifu DX; Keyser-Marcus L
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Nov; 79(11):1386-90. PubMed ID: 9821898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Length of stay of stroke rehabilitation inpatients: prediction through the functional independence measure.
    Franchignoni F; Tesio L; Martino MT; Benevolo E; Castagna M
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1998; 34(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 10234877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of use of the Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and cognition in patients with stroke.
    Okazaki H; Sonoda S; Suzuki T; Saitoh E; Okamoto S
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):276-80. PubMed ID: 18755407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Manual function of the unaffected upper extremity can affect functional outcome after stroke.
    Cho TH; Jeong YJ; Lee HJ; Moon HI
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2019 Mar; 42(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 30234734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitively impaired stroke patients do benefit from admission to an acute rehabilitation unit.
    Rabadi MH; Rabadi FM; Edelstein L; Peterson M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Mar; 89(3):441-8. PubMed ID: 18295621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting Motor and Cognitive Improvement Through Machine Learning Algorithm in Human Subject that Underwent a Rehabilitation Treatment in the Early Stage of Stroke.
    Sale P; Ferriero G; Ciabattoni L; Cortese AM; Ferracuti F; Romeo L; Piccione F; Masiero S
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2962-2972. PubMed ID: 30077601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional task benchmarks for stroke rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG; Fiedler RC; Granger CV; Maislin G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 May; 79(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 9596388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.