These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9355658)

  • 1. On the interpretation of "mean +/- s", II. Alternative questions and answers.
    Jílek M
    Acta Univ Carol Med (Praha); 1993; 39(1-4):9-31. PubMed ID: 9355658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immunoassay methods for the detection of antigens and antibodies: the reverse plaque-forming cell assay.
    Molinaro GA; Eby WC; Molinaro CA
    Methods Enzymol; 1981; 73(Pt B):326-38. PubMed ID: 7029204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling microarray data using a threshold mixture model.
    Kauermann G; Eilers P
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):376-87. PubMed ID: 15180663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Study of immunization protocol of ovarian carcinoma associated 6B11 anti-idiotypical minibody].
    Zhu HL; Li Y; Chang XH; Cui H; Feng J; Wei LH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 41(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 16635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.
    Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond the P: II: precluding a puddle of P values.
    Wilhelmus KR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2207-8. PubMed ID: 15474837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CA 125 determined by three methods in samples from patients with human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA).
    Turpeinen U; Lehtovirta P; Stenman UH
    Clin Chem; 1995 Nov; 41(11):1667-9. PubMed ID: 7586563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of a new blocker against anti-ruthenium antibody interference in the Elecsys free triiodothyronine assay.
    Sapin R; Agin A; Gasser F
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(3):416-8. PubMed ID: 17378744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple qualitative immunoassay of human anti-mouse antibodies evaluated.
    Kricka LJ; Nozaki O; Goodman DB; Ji X
    Clin Chem; 1992 Dec; 38(12):2558-60. PubMed ID: 1458602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian, combinatorial approach to capture-recapture.
    García-Pelayo R
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 16904143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical analysis of animal cancer chemoprevention experiments.
    Marimuthu P
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1157. PubMed ID: 8805772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical considerations and techniques for understanding physiological data, modeling, and treatments.
    Fitzpatrick BG
    Cardiovasc Eng; 2008 Jun; 8(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 18172762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of serial dilution error on calibration inference in immunoassay.
    Higgins KM; Davidian M; Chew G; Burge H
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 9544505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gamma generalized linear models for pharmacokinetic data.
    Salway R; Wakefield J
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):620-6. PubMed ID: 17888039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence intervals of effect size for paired studies.
    Wu J; Jiang G
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 17634978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why 5%?
    Gauvreau K; Pagano M
    Nutrition; 1994; 10(1):93-4. PubMed ID: 8199441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A potential outcomes approach to developmental toxicity analyses.
    Elliott MR; Joffe MM; Chen Z
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):352-60. PubMed ID: 16918899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic analysis of multivariate failure time data.
    Aalen OO; Fosen J; Weedon-Fekjaer H; Borgan O; Husebye E
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):764-73. PubMed ID: 15339300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.