These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. [Minimal invasive coronary surgery: the wrong way in heart surgery?]. Knothe C; Hempelmann G Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1997 Dec; 32(12):707. PubMed ID: 9498085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with "on-pump" double bypass grafting. de Cannière D; Jansens JL; Goldschmidt-Clermont P; Barvais L; Decroly P; Stoupel E Am Heart J; 2001 Oct; 142(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 11579343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery. Jaffery Z; Kowalski M; Weaver WD; Khanal S Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 17300948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A successful case of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) followed by PTCA]. Nishina T; Matsuda K; Nomoto S; Nishimura K; Koshiji T; Sato T; Ueyama K; Nonaka M; Ban T Kyobu Geka; 1998 Feb; 51(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 9492465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of occlusion devices for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery on coronary endothelial function of atherosclerotic arteries. Perrault LP; Desjardins N; Nickner C; Geoffroy P; Tanguay J; Carrier M Heart Surg Forum; 2000; 3(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 11178289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]