These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9355950)

  • 1. In vitro and in vivo experiences with ureterorenoscope by Gelet.
    Weber A; Michel MS; Krautschick AW; Köhrmann KU; Alken P
    J Endourol; 1997 Oct; 11(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 9355950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative study of two latest generation flexible ureterorenoscopes].
    Traxer O; Pasqui F; Dubosq F; Chambade D; Beley S; Sebe P; Gattegno B; Thibault P
    Prog Urol; 2005 Sep; 15(4):656-61. PubMed ID: 16459681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective assessment of working tool impact on irrigation flow and visibility in flexible ureterorenoscopes.
    Bach T; Netsch C; Herrmann TR; Gross AJ
    J Endourol; 2011 Jul; 25(7):1125-9. PubMed ID: 21682598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conventional high pressure versus newly developed continuous-flow ureterorenoscope: urodynamic pressure evaluation of the renal pelvis and flow capacity.
    Michel MS; Honeck P; Alken P
    J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):1083-5. PubMed ID: 18419336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Flexible Ureterorenoscope Quality of Vision: An In Vitro Study.
    Talso M; Proietti S; Emiliani E; Gallioli A; Dragos L; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Giusti G; Montanari E; Somani B; Traxer O
    J Endourol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):523-528. PubMed ID: 29562765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rigid ureteroscopes with fiberoptic imaging bundles: features and irrigating capacity.
    Abdel Razzak OM; Bagley DH
    J Endourol; 1994 Dec; 8(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 7703992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes.
    Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P
    Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures?
    Binbay M; Yuruk E; Akman T; Ozgor F; Seyrek M; Ozkuvanci U; Berberoglu Y; Muslumanoglu AY
    J Endourol; 2010 Dec; 24(12):1929-34. PubMed ID: 21043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new generation of semirigid fiberoptic ureteroscopes.
    Ferraro RF; Abraham VE; Cohen TD; Preminger GM
    J Endourol; 1999 Feb; 13(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10102126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ureteral endoscopy with passively deflectable, irrigating flexible ureteroscopes.
    Bagley DH
    Urology; 1987 Feb; 29(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 3811095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the physical properties of four new generation flexible ureteroscopes: (de)flection, flow properties, torsion stiffness, and optical characteristics.
    Paffen ML; Keizer JG; de Winter GV; Arends AJ; Hendrikx AJ
    J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2227-34. PubMed ID: 18831670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-use versus reusable ureterorenoscopes for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): systematic comparative analysis of physical and optical properties in three different devices.
    Deininger S; Haberstock L; Kruck S; Neumann E; da Costa IA; Todenhöfer T; Bedke J; Stenzl A; Rausch S
    World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2059-2063. PubMed ID: 29869701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.
    Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation.
    Kruck S; Anastasiadis AG; Gakis G; Walcher U; Hennenlotter J; Merseburger AS; Stenzl A; Nagele U
    Urol Res; 2011 Dec; 39(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 21442342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible ureterorenoscopy.
    Aso Y; Takayasu H; Ohta N; Tajima A
    Urol Clin North Am; 1988 Aug; 15(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 3043863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardized ex vivo comparison of different upper urinary tract biopsy devices: impact on ureterorenoscopes and tissue quality.
    Ritter M; Bolenz C; Bach T; Ströbel P; Häcker A
    World J Urol; 2013 Aug; 31(4):907-12. PubMed ID: 22451168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First digital flexible ureterorenoscope: initial experience.
    Mitchell S; Havranek E; Patel A
    J Endourol; 2008 Jan; 22(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 18315473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ex vivo Comparison of 2 Disposable versus a State-of-the-Art Reusable Ureterorenoscope.
    Bourdoumis A; El Howairis MEF; Stephen B; Buchholz N
    Urol Int; 2020; 104(5-6):437-444. PubMed ID: 31466078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr.
    Afane JS; Olweny EO; Bercowsky E; Sundaram CP; Dunn MD; Shalhav AL; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1164-8. PubMed ID: 10992358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure.
    Ng YH; Somani BK; Dennison A; Kata SG; Nabi G; Brown S
    J Endourol; 2010 Dec; 24(12):1915-20. PubMed ID: 21067276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.