These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9356281)

  • 1. Health risk assessment of drinking water contaminants in Canada: the applicability of mixture risk assessment methods.
    Krishnan K; Paterson J; Williams DT
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 9356281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products in drinking water: a review and roadmap for research.
    Richardson SD; Plewa MJ; Wagner ED; Schoeny R; Demarini DM
    Mutat Res; 2007; 636(1-3):178-242. PubMed ID: 17980649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty characterization approaches for risk assessment of DBPs in drinking water: a review.
    Chowdhury S; Champagne P; McLellan PJ
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1680-91. PubMed ID: 19167150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approaches for evaluating the relevance of multiroute exposures in establishing guideline values for drinking water contaminants.
    Krishnan K; Carrier R
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2008; 26(3):300-16. PubMed ID: 18781539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the similarity of complex drinking-water disinfection by-product mixtures: overview of the issues.
    Rice GE; Teuschler LK; Bull RJ; Simmons JE; Feder PI
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(7):429-36. PubMed ID: 19267305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deriving uncertainty factors for threshold chemical contaminants in drinking water.
    Ritter L; Totman C; Krishnan K; Carrier R; Vézina A; Morisset V
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2007 Oct; 10(7):527-57. PubMed ID: 17934949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Persistence of pharmaceutical compounds and other organic wastewater contaminants in a conventional drinking-water-treatment plant.
    Stackelberg PE; Furlong ET; Meyer MT; Zaugg SD; Henderson AK; Reissman DB
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Aug; 329(1-3):99-113. PubMed ID: 15262161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Historical reconstruction of wastewater and land use impacts to groundwater used for public drinking water: exposure assessment using chemical data and GIS.
    Swartz CH; Rudel RA; Kachajian JR; Brody JG
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Sep; 13(5):403-16. PubMed ID: 12973368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporating biologically based models into assessments of risk from chemical contaminants.
    Bull RJ; Conolly RB; De Marini DM; MacPhail RC; Ohanian EV; Swenberg JA
    J Am Water Works Assoc; 1993 Mar; 85(3):49-52. PubMed ID: 11538064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and regulation of pesticides in drinking water: A Canadian approach.
    Ritter L; Wood G
    Food Addit Contam; 1989; 6 Suppl 1():S87-94. PubMed ID: 2599159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of noncancer risk assessment approaches for use in deriving drinking water criteria.
    Gibson MC; deMonsabert SM; Orme-Zavaleta J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Dec; 26(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 9441915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the adequacy of maximum contaminant levels as health-protective cleanup goals: an analysis based on Monte Carlo techniques.
    Finley BL; Scott P; Paustenbach DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):438-55. PubMed ID: 8128005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A human health risk assessment of boron (boric acid and borax) in drinking water.
    Murray FJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Dec; 22(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 8837846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toxicological relevance of emerging contaminants for drinking water quality.
    Schriks M; Heringa MB; van der Kooi MM; de Voogt P; van Wezel AP
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(2):461-76. PubMed ID: 19766285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toxicity assessment strategies, data requirements, and risk assessment approaches to derive health based guidance values for non-relevant metabolites of plant protection products.
    Dekant W; Melching-Kollmuss S; Kalberlah F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19883711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of California Public Health Goals (PHGs) for chemicals in drinking water.
    Howd RA; Brown JP; Morry DW; Wang YY; Bankowska J; Budroe JD; Campbell M; DiBartolomeis MJ; Faust J; Jowa L; Lewis D; Parker T; Polakoff J; Rice DW; Salmon AG; Tomar RS; Fan AM
    J Appl Toxicol; 2000; 20(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11139167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk assessment on disinfection by-products of drinking water of different water sources and disinfection processes.
    Wang W; Ye B; Yang L; Li Y; Wang Y
    Environ Int; 2007 Feb; 33(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 17056115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drinking water quality management: a holistic approach.
    Rizak S; Cunliffe D; Sinclair M; Vulcano R; Howard J; Hrudey S; Callan P
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(9):31-6. PubMed ID: 12830937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.