354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9356635)
1. Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat.
Jinzaki M; Tanimoto A; Narimatsu Y; Ohkuma K; Kurata T; Shinmoto H; Hiramatsu K; Mukai M; Murai M
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 9356635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT.
Zhang YY; Luo S; Liu Y; Xu RT
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 23321146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Findings of Fat-Poor Angiomyolipomas.
Potretzke AM; Potretzke TA; Bauman TM; Knight BA; Park AM; Mobley JM; Figenshau RS; Siegel CL
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):119-128. PubMed ID: 27897036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat.
Hosokawa Y; Kinouchi T; Sawai Y; Mano M; Kiuchi H; Meguro N; Maeda O; Kuroda M; Usami M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 7(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 12018109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma.
Schieda N; Hodgdon T; El-Khodary M; Flood TA; McInnes MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25415700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unenhanced CT and MRI Parameters That Can Be Used to Reliably Predict Fat-Invisible Angiomyolipoma.
Jeong CJ; Park BK; Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26797361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 27824487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of T2-weighted MR imaging in differentiating low-fat renal angiomyolipomas from other renal tumors.
Choi HJ; Kim JK; Ahn H; Kim CS; Kim MH; Cho KS
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 21498374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney: radiological imaging.
Tsukada J; Jinzaki M; Yao M; Nagashima Y; Mikami S; Yashiro H; Nozaki M; Mizuno R; Oya M; Kuribayashi S
Int J Urol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1105-11. PubMed ID: 23551572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat?
Catalano OA; Samir AE; Sahani DV; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):738-46. PubMed ID: 18413886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stepwise algorithm using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of fat-poor angiomyolipoma in small renal masses: Development and external validation.
Tanaka H; Fujii Y; Tanaka H; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Uehara S; Numao N; Yuasa T; Yamamoto S; Masuda H; Yonese J; Kihara K
Int J Urol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):511-517. PubMed ID: 28600877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma: the initial study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Lu Q; Wang W; Huang B; Li C; Li C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1896-901. PubMed ID: 22906749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do Incidental Hyperechoic Renal Lesions Measuring Up to 1 cm Warrant Further Imaging? Outcomes of 161 Lesions.
Doshi AM; Ayoola A; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):346-350. PubMed ID: 28609114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Leng S; Kitajima K; Gomez-Cardona D; Thapa P; Carter RE; Leibovich BC; Sasiwimonphan K; Sasaguri K; Kawashima A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1194-202. PubMed ID: 26587925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma by texture analysis on CT images.
Yan L; Liu Z; Wang G; Huang Y; Liu Y; Yu Y; Liang C
Acad Radiol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):1115-21. PubMed ID: 26031228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SH; Kim SY
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1258-69. PubMed ID: 24259298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity ratio curve analysis of small renal masses on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Moriyama S; Yoshida S; Tanaka H; Tanaka H; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 29577440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
