141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9357741)
1. Identification of findings suspicious for breast cancer based on natural language processing of mammogram reports.
Jain NL; Friedman C
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1997; ():829-33. PubMed ID: 9357741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of suspected tuberculosis patients based on natural language processing of chest radiograph reports.
Jain NL; Knirsch CA; Friedman C; Hripcsak G
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():542-6. PubMed ID: 8947725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the ability of natural language processing to extract data from nursing narratives.
Hyun S; Johnson SB; Bakken S
Comput Inform Nurs; 2009; 27(4):215-23; quiz 224-5. PubMed ID: 19574746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limited parsing of notational text visit notes: ad-hoc vs. NLP approaches.
Barrows Jr RC; Busuioc M; Friedman C
Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():51-5. PubMed ID: 11079843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatically correlating clinical findings and body locations in radiology reports using MedLEE.
Sevenster M; van Ommering R; Qian Y
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Apr; 25(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 21796490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlating mammographic and pathologic findings in clinical decision support using natural language processing and data mining methods.
Patel TA; Puppala M; Ogunti RO; Ensor JE; He T; Shewale JB; Ankerst DP; Kaklamani VG; Rodriguez AA; Wong ST; Chang JC
Cancer; 2017 Jan; 123(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 27571243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated detection of ambiguity in BI-RADS assessment categories in mammography reports.
Bozkurt S; Rubin D
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 197():35-9. PubMed ID: 24743074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved determination of breast cancer size in mammography.
Sphiris N; Panayiotakis G; Proimos B; Likaki H; Tzoracoleftherakis E
Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8885094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports.
Bozkurt S; Lipson JA; Senol U; Rubin DL
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Apr; 22(e1):e81-92. PubMed ID: 25352567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A study of image processing condition of mammography using FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography)].
Nakata M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 49(4):454-67. PubMed ID: 2798048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency.
Polakowski WE; Cournoyer DA; Rogers SK; DeSimio MP; Ruck DW; Hoffmeister JW; Raines RA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):811-9. PubMed ID: 9533581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A broad-coverage natural language processing system.
Friedman C
Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():270-4. PubMed ID: 11079887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extracting findings from narrative reports: software transferability and sources of physician disagreement.
Hripcsak G; Kuperman GJ; Friedman C
Methods Inf Med; 1998 Jan; 37(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9550840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repurposing the clinical record: can an existing natural language processing system de-identify clinical notes?
Morrison FP; Li L; Lai AM; Hripcsak G
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2009; 16(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 18952938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monitoring free-text data using medical language processing.
Zingmond D; Lenert LA
Comput Biomed Res; 1993 Oct; 26(5):467-81. PubMed ID: 8243070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer screening: options beyond the mammogram. The mammogram remains the foundation of breast cancer screening, but variations on this test can improve detection for some women.
Harv Womens Health Watch; 2014 Jul; 21(11):3. PubMed ID: 25219012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. False-negative mammograms in patients with breast cancer.
Niloff PH; Sheiner NM
Can J Surg; 1981 Jan; 24(1):50, 52. PubMed ID: 7459735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technique.
Cheng HD; Lui YM; Freimanis RI
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):442-50. PubMed ID: 9735907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
