142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9357742)
1. The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making.
Laufer BZ; Baharav H; Langer Y; Cardash HS
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):629-35. PubMed ID: 9357742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of displacement time on gingival crevice width.
Baharav H; Laufer BZ; Langer Y; Cardash HS
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 9484057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Three-dimensional model analysis of the gingival sulcus width from different retraction time].
Zhang Jj; Liu Yh; Lv Pj; Zhao Yj
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Feb; 43(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 21321624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of gingival retraction methods.
Azzi R; Tsao TF; Carranza FA; Kenney EB
J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Oct; 50(4):561-5. PubMed ID: 6355446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The matrix impression system for fixed prosthodontics.
Livaditis GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 9513108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Rubber dam technic. III. Gingival retraction for bridgework].
Howard WW; Moller RC
Phillip J Restaur Zahnmed; 1984; 1(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 6100698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the new matrix system with traditional fixed prosthodontic impression procedures.
Livaditis GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 9513107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical comparison of methods of gingival retraction in cemented prosthetics].
Touati B; Dahancohen R
Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1983 Mar; (141):17-54. PubMed ID: 6349282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A rationale for management of the dentogingival junction.
Schmitt SM; Brown FH
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 2685235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tissue displacement methods in fixed prosthodontics.
Benson BW; Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA; Hoffman W
J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Feb; 55(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 3514852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.
Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J
Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A technique to record the gingival configuration of an interim implant-supported fixed partial denture.
Yiqing H; Yuting H; Wang J
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):495-497. PubMed ID: 29703668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The global impression technic in fixed dentures].
Lamy M; Mainjot A
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 16193850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gingival tissue response to rotary curettage.
Kamansky FW; Tempel TR; Post AC
J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Sep; 52(3):380-3. PubMed ID: 6384476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
