These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9357752)

  • 1. Autoradiographic determination of marginal leakage of a pressed glass ceramic inlay.
    Canay RS; Hersek NE; Uzun G; Ercan MT
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):705-8. PubMed ID: 9357752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
    Hahn P; Attin T; Gröfke M; Hellwig E
    Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of inlay ceramic systems luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Uludag B; Yucedag E; Sahin V
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 25264550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
    Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal leakage in class II-restorations after use of ceramic-inserts luted with different materials.
    Hahn P; Schaller HG; Müllner U; Hellwig E
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):567-74. PubMed ID: 9781859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
    Molin MK; Karlsson SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation.
    Gemalmaz D; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):646-51. PubMed ID: 9357744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of acid neutralization and mechanical cycling on the microtensile bond strength of glass-ceramic inlays.
    Saavedra G; Ariki EK; Federico CD; Galhano G; Zamboni S; Baldissara P; Valandro LF
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 19363977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
    Karaağaclioğlu L; Zaimoğlu A; Akören AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal integrity after fatigue loading of ceramic inlay restorations luted with three different cements.
    Abdalla AI; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 11764831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.