These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9358083)
41. Continuous glucose monitoring in subcutaneous tissue using factory-calibrated sensors: a pilot study. Hoss U; Jeddi I; Schulz M; Budiman E; Bhogal C; McGarraugh G Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Aug; 12(8):591-7. PubMed ID: 20615099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Optical coherence tomography-based continuous noninvasive glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes. Gabbay RA; Sivarajah S Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Jun; 10(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 18473692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Accuracy and precision of glucose monitoring are relevant to treatment decision-making and clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with diabetes. Voulgari C; Tentolouris N Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Jul; 13(7):723-30. PubMed ID: 21699417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Optimal timing for postprandial glucose measurement in pregnant women with diabetes and a non-diabetic pregnant population evaluated by the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS). Bühling KJ; Winkel T; Wolf C; Kurzidim B; Mahmoudi M; Wohlfarth K; Wäscher C; Schink T; Dudenhausen JW J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 15843262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A minimally invasive system for glucose area under the curve measurement using interstitial fluid extraction technology: evaluation of the accuracy and usefulness with oral glucose tolerance tests in subjects with and without diabetes. Sakaguchi K; Hirota Y; Hashimoto N; Ogawa W; Sato T; Okada S; Hagino K; Asakura Y; Kikkawa Y; Kojima J; Maekawa Y; Nakajima H Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jun; 14(6):485-91. PubMed ID: 22537393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The promise of optical sensing strategies for glucose. Klonoff DC Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(4):401-2. PubMed ID: 11474823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Improved postprandial glycemic control with Humalog Mix75/25 after a standard test meal in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Malone JK; Woodworth JR; Arora V; Yang H; Campaigne BN; Hallé JP; Yale JF; Grossman LD Clin Ther; 2000 Feb; 22(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 10743981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Glucose sensing in transdermal body fluid collected under continuous vacuum pressure via micropores in the stratum corneum. Gebhart S; Faupel M; Fowler R; Kapsner C; Lincoln D; McGee V; Pasqua J; Steed L; Wangsness M; Xu F; Vanstory M Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 12871605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Flash Glucose Monitoring: Differences Between Intermittently Scanned and Continuously Stored Data. Pleus S; Kamecke U; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 12(2):397-400. PubMed ID: 28990438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A study of forearm versus finger stick glucose monitoring. Lee DM; Weinert SE; Miller EE Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(1):13-23; discussion 45-7. PubMed ID: 12017415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Glucose sensing technology-current practice? Forde HE; Browne S; Smith D; Tormey WP Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):125-127. PubMed ID: 29619681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Head-to-head comparison between flash and continuous glucose monitoring systems in outpatients with type 1 diabetes. Bonora B; Maran A; Ciciliot S; Avogaro A; Fadini GP J Endocrinol Invest; 2016 Dec; 39(12):1391-1399. PubMed ID: 27287421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Minimally invasive extraction of dermal interstitial fluid for glucose monitoring using microneedles. Wang PM; Cornwell M; Prausnitz MR Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Feb; 7(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 15738711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Alternative site blood glucose testing: a multicenter study. Fedele D; Corsi A; Noacco C; Prisco F; Squatrito S; Torre E; Iafusco D; Errico MK; Toniato R; Nicolucci A; Franciosi M; De Berardis G; Neri L Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 14709201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Measurement Performance of Two Continuous Tissue Glucose Monitoring Systems Intended for Replacement of Blood Glucose Monitoring. Freckmann G; Link M; Pleus S; Westhoff A; Kamecke U; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Aug; 20(8):541-549. PubMed ID: 30067410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Estimating intraday blood glucose variability through self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes]. Lü LF; Wang C; Liu GJ; Chen DW; Chen LH; Li YH; Zhou J; Jia WP; Ran XW Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Jan; 42(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 21355311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of daily glycemic profiles in well controlled children with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a continuous glucose monitoring system. Tucholski K; Deja G; Skała-Zamorowska E; Jarosz-Chobot P Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab; 2009; 15(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 19454186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Pilot study in human healthy volunteers on the use of magnetohydrodynamics in needle-free continuous glucose monitoring. Hakala TA; Zschaechner LK; Vänskä RT; Nurminen TA; Wardale M; Morina J; Boeva ZA; Saukkonen R; Alakoskela JM; Pettersson-Fernholm K; Hæggström E; Bobacka J; García Pérez A Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):18318. PubMed ID: 36351930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]