These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9358462)

  • 1. Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays.
    Constantinides CD; Atalar E; McVeigh ER
    Magn Reson Med; 1997 Nov; 38(5):852-7. PubMed ID: 9358462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptively optimized combination (AOC) of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data from phased array coils.
    Fang L; Wu M; Ke H; Kumar A; Yang S
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jun; 75(6):2235-44. PubMed ID: 26190475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing the signal-to-noise ratio by using vertically stacked phased array coils for low-field magnetic resonance imaging.
    Liang D; Hui HT; Yeo TS
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2012 Nov; 16(6):1150-6. PubMed ID: 22575694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of proximity and noise level of phased array coil elements on overall signal-to-noise in parallel MR spectroscopy.
    Fleischer CC; Zhong X; Mao H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47():125-130. PubMed ID: 29217493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noise correlations and SNR in phased-array MRS.
    Martini N; Santarelli MF; Giovannetti G; Milanesi M; De Marchi D; Positano V; Landini L
    NMR Biomed; 2010 Jan; 23(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19708042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An unbiased signal-to-noise ratio measure for magnetic resonance images.
    McGibney G; Smith MR
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1077-8. PubMed ID: 8413015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of power images to perform quantitative analysis on low SNR MR images.
    Miller AJ; Joseph PM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 11(7):1051-6. PubMed ID: 8231670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Accuracy of signal-to-noise ratio measurement method for magnetic resonance images].
    Ogura A; Miyai A; Maeda F; Fukutake H; Kikumoto R
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Apr; 59(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 12743522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intensity correction of phased-array surface coil images.
    Murakami JW; Hayes CE; Weinberger E
    Magn Reson Med; 1996 Apr; 35(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 8992210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An NMR phased array for human cardiac 31P spectroscopy.
    Hardy CJ; Bottomley PA; Rohling KW; Roemer PB
    Magn Reson Med; 1992 Nov; 28(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 1435221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The NMR phased array.
    Roemer PB; Edelstein WA; Hayes CE; Souza SP; Mueller OM
    Magn Reson Med; 1990 Nov; 16(2):192-225. PubMed ID: 2266841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing real-world advantages for the clinical neuroradiologist between a high field (3 T), a phased array (1.5 T) vs. a single-channel 1.5-T MR system.
    Orbach DB; Wu C; Law M; Babb JS; Lee R; Padua A; Knopp EA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 16767701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity of an eight-element phased array coil in 3 Tesla MR imaging: a basic analysis.
    Hiratsuka Y; Miki H; Kikuchi K; Kiriyama I; Mochizuki T; Takahashi S; Sadamoto K
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2007; 6(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 18037798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of averaging spatially correlated noise for 3-D radial imaging.
    Stobbe RW; Beaulieu C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Jul; 30(7):1381-90. PubMed ID: 21335306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combination of signals from array coils using image-based estimation of coil sensitivity profiles.
    Bydder M; Larkman DJ; Hajnal JV
    Magn Reson Med; 2002 Mar; 47(3):539-48. PubMed ID: 11870841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new single acquisition, two-image difference method for determining MR image SNR.
    Steckner MC; Liu B; Ying L
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):662-71. PubMed ID: 19292008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Signal-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise efficiency in SMASH imaging.
    Sodickson DK; Griswold MA; Jakob PM; Edelman RR; Manning WJ
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 May; 41(5):1009-22. PubMed ID: 10332885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effects of region of interest settings in signal-to-noise ratio measurement of clinical images using arrays of multiple receiver coils].
    Kitoh Y; Imai H; Miyati T; Ogura A; Machida Y; Doi T; Tuchihashi T; Kobayashi M; Shimizu K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(9):1269-78. PubMed ID: 23001275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of adaptive combination of 30-channel head receive coil array data in 23Na MR imaging.
    Benkhedah N; Hoffmann SH; Biller A; Nagel AM
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Feb; 75(2):527-36. PubMed ID: 25820121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computationally rapid method of estimating signal-to-noise ratio for phased array image reconstructions.
    Wiens CN; Kisch SJ; Willig-Onwuachi JD; McKenzie CA
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Oct; 66(4):1192-7. PubMed ID: 21465545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.