These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9358952)

  • 1. Confidence interval of single dipole locations based on EEG data.
    Braun C; Kaiser S; Kincses WE; Elbert T
    Brain Topogr; 1997; 10(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 9358952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Somatotopic finger mapping using MEG: toward an optimal stimulation paradigm.
    Jamali S; Ross B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Aug; 124(8):1659-70. PubMed ID: 23518470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Different laterality between the thumb and index finger in human SII activities.
    Hamada Y; Nozawa T; Kado H; Suzuki R
    Neuroreport; 2000 Nov; 11(16):3603-6. PubMed ID: 11095527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MEG and EEG source localization in beamspace.
    Rodríguez-Rivera A; Baryshnikov BV; Van Veen BD; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):430-41. PubMed ID: 16532769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: a comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods.
    Murro AM; Smith JR; King DW; Park YD
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 8793122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disentangling Somatosensory Evoked Potentials of the Fingers: Limitations and Clinical Potential.
    Kalogianni K; Daffertshofer A; van der Helm FCT; Schouten AC; de Munck JC;
    Brain Topogr; 2018 May; 31(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 29353446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
    Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volumetric estimation of functional brain regions in small children using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography: differentiating thumb from middle finger.
    Xiang J; Holowka S; Qiao H; Sun B; Chuang S
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():110. PubMed ID: 16012596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thalamocortical impulse propagation and information transfer in EEG and MEG.
    Götz T; Huonker R; Witte OW; Haueisen J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Jun; 31(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 24887610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Somatosensory-evoked fields for gingiva, lip, and tongue.
    Nakahara H; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Murayama S; Hatanaka K; Itoh H; Yoshimoto T
    J Dent Res; 2004 Apr; 83(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 15044504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative source localization of electrically and pressure-stimulated multichannel somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Kawohl W; Waberski TD; Darvas F; Norra C; Gobbelé R; Buchner H
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 24(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 17545829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studying the human somatosensory hand area: A new way to compare fMRI and MEG.
    Stoeckel MC; Pollok B; Schnitzler A; Seitz RJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Aug; 164(2):280-91. PubMed ID: 17597225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-coherent expansion of MEG/EEG cortical sources.
    David O; Garnero L
    Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1277-89. PubMed ID: 12414267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No somatotopy of sensorimotor alpha-oscillation responses to differential finger stimulation.
    Nierula B; Hohlefeld FU; Curio G; Nikulin VV
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():294-303. PubMed ID: 23523812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.