These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9360064)

  • 1. Dynamic characterization of a new accelerated heart valve tester.
    Menzler F; Haubold AD; Hwang NH
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M372-7. PubMed ID: 9360064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic impact stress analysis of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Yuan Q; Xu L; Ngoi BK; Yeo TJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jan; 12(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12578344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.
    Cox JL; Ad N; Myers K; Gharib M; Quijano RC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 16077422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the closing dynamics of mechanical prosthetic heart valves.
    Naemura K; Ohta Y; Fujimoto T; Umezu M; Matsumoto H; Dohi T
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M401-4. PubMed ID: 9360070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Dynamic and cinematic evaluation of the function of bioprosthesis in the aortic position: tester of cardiac valves].
    Bustamante J; Santamaría J; Infante O; Flores P; Juárez A
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1996; 66(3):229-43. PubMed ID: 8967818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement and reconstruction of the leaflet geometry for a pericardial artificial heart valve.
    Jiang H; Campbell G; Xi F
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15642513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation technique for bileaflet mechanical valves.
    Shipkowitz T; Ambrus J; Kurk J; Wickramasinghe K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 12000172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new design for polyurethane heart valves.
    Butterfield M; Wheatley DJ; Williams DF; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 11206756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opening and closing kinematics of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 134(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 17723814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach.
    Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro evaluation of the long-body On-X bileaflet heart valve.
    Hwang NH; Reul H; Reinhard P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 9793857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accelerated life testing of prosthetic heart valves.
    Fettel BE; Johnston DR; Morris PE
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 7382899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamic performance of the Ultracor and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses using exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography.
    Hobson NA; Wilkinson GA; Wheeldon NM; Lynch J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):828-34. PubMed ID: 16359066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flow in prosthetic heart valves: state-of-the-art and future directions.
    Yoganathan AP; Chandran KB; Sotiropoulos F
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1689-94. PubMed ID: 16389514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New laboratory technique measures projected dynamic area of prosthetic heart valves.
    Scotten LN; Walker DK
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jan; 13(1):120-32; discussion 132-3. PubMed ID: 14765850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flow-dependent re-endothelialization of tissue-engineered heart valves.
    Lichtenberg A; Cebotari S; Tudorache I; Sturz G; Winterhalter M; Hilfiker A; Haverich A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Mar; 15(2):287-93; discussion 293-4. PubMed ID: 16607913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.