These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Sequence-sensitive exemplar and decision-bound accounts of speeded-classification performance in a modified Garner-tasks paradigm. Little DR; Wang T; Nosofsky RM Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():1-38. PubMed ID: 27472912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model. Nosofsky RM; Alfonso-Reese LA Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):78-93. PubMed ID: 10087858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An exemplar-retrieval model of speeded same--different judgments. Cohen AL; Nosofsky RM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Oct; 26(5):1549-69. PubMed ID: 11039484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness. Grau JW; Kemler Nelson DG J Exp Psychol Gen; 1988 Dec; 117(4):347-70. PubMed ID: 2974862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. Nosofsky RM; Little DR; Donkin C; Fific M Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):280-315. PubMed ID: 21355662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hard and soft interacting dimensions: differential effects of dual context on classification. Melara RD; Marks LE Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):307-25. PubMed ID: 2345683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Nosofsky RM; Palmeri TJ Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):266-300. PubMed ID: 9127583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective reports of stimulus, response, and decision times in speeded tasks: how accurate are decision time reports? Miller J; Vieweg P; Kruize N; McLea B Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):1013-36. PubMed ID: 20580268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Logical-rule models of classification response times: a synthesis of mental-architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. Fific M; Little DR; Nosofsky RM Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):309-48. PubMed ID: 20438229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Garner interference is not solely driven by stimulus uncertainty. Burns DM Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1846-1853. PubMed ID: 27246090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks. Koch I; Metin B; Schuch S Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 12684780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch, and loudness. Melara RD; Marks LE Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 2385491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels. Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 16634673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Range effects of an irrelevant dimension on classification. Huettel SA; Lockhead GR Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1624-45. PubMed ID: 10598475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]