These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9360481)

  • 1. Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli.
    Mattes S; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Oct; 59(7):1089-97. PubMed ID: 9360481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of a neutral warning signal under increased temporal uncertainty.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1346-1357. PubMed ID: 36811693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prior time uncertainty reduction of foreperiod duration in schizophrenia and old age.
    Mo SS; Kersey R
    J Clin Psychol; 1977 Jan; 33(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 833327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer effects in auditory temporal preparation occur using an unfilled but not filled foreperiod.
    Crowe EM; Los SA; Schindler L; Kent C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Aug; 74(8):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 33535929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 19576562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time?
    Ulrich R; Mattes S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Nov; 49(4):972-90. PubMed ID: 8962543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention and reaction times to signals of uncertain modality.
    Boulter LR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1977 Aug; 3(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 886275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A New Foreperiod Effect on Intertrial Phase Coherence. Part I: Existence and Behavioral Relevance.
    Rapela J; Westerfield M; Townsend J
    Neural Comput; 2018 Sep; 30(9):2348-2383. PubMed ID: 29949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of foreperiod duration on reflexive and voluntary responses to intense noise bursts.
    Sollers JJ; Hackley SA
    Psychophysiology; 1997 Sep; 34(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 9299906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of warning signal intensity on reaction time and components of the contingent negative variation.
    Loveless NE; Sanford AJ
    Biol Psychol; 1975; 2(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 1139019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distraction by irrelevant sound during foreperiods selectively impairs temporal preparation.
    Steinborn MB; Langner R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):405-18. PubMed ID: 21333960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of change in lead stimulus modality on the modulation of acoustic blink startle.
    Lipp OV; Siddle DA; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Nov; 37(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 11117451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Timeline of Motor Preparatory State Prior to Response Initiation: Evidence from Startle.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jan; 397():80-93. PubMed ID: 30471355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prior time uncertainty reduction of foreperiod duration under two different levels of event uncertainty in schizophrenia.
    Mo SS; Kersey R; Lowe WC
    J Clin Psychol; 1977 Jan; 33(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 833329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prior time uncertainty reduction of foreperiod duration under two different levels of event uncertainty in process and reactive schizophrenia.
    Mo SS; Kersey R; Lowe WC
    J Clin Psychol; 1977 Apr; 33(2):381-4. PubMed ID: 858789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of response complexity on simple reaction time occurs even with a highly predictable imperative stimulus.
    Maslovat D; Klapp ST; Forgaard CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jun; 704():62-66. PubMed ID: 30946926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force.
    Ulrich R; Rinkenauer G; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):915-28. PubMed ID: 9627425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.