178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9361645)
1. Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer: preliminary results from a new program.
Chart PL; Franssen E
CMAJ; 1997 Nov; 157(9):1235-42. PubMed ID: 9361645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer.
Cohen M
Psychooncology; 2006 Oct; 15(10):873-83. PubMed ID: 16374894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.
Kuhl C; Weigel S; Schrading S; Arand B; Bieling H; König R; Tombach B; Leutner C; Rieber-Brambs A; Nordhoff D; Heindel W; Reiser M; Schild HH
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 28(9):1450-7. PubMed ID: 20177029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Screening for breast cancer on basis of individual risk assessment for women ineligible for the national population screening program].
van Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; van der Horst F; de Koning HJ; Rutgers EJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jan; 145(3):120-5. PubMed ID: 11206121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening.
Ma I; Dueck A; Gray R; Wasif N; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Pizzitola V; Pockaj B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening behaviors and long-term compliance with mammography guidelines in a breast cancer screening program.
Weinberg AD; Cooper HP; Lane M; Kripalani S
Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9037339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-year prospective adherence to three breast cancer screening modalities.
Solomon LJ; Mickey RM; Rairikar CJ; Worden JK; Flynn BS
Prev Med; 1998; 27(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 9922058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for breast cancer screening among Malaysian women.
Parsa P; Kandiah M; Mohd Nasir MT; Hejar AR; Nor Afiah MZ
Singapore Med J; 2008 Nov; 49(11):897-903. PubMed ID: 19037556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening methods: a review of the evidence.
Vahabi M
Health Care Women Int; 2003 Nov; 24(9):773-93. PubMed ID: 14742116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time.
Aiken LS; Fenaughty AM; West SG; Johnson JJ; Luckett TL
Womens Health; 1995; 1(1):27-50. PubMed ID: 9373372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI screening in a clinic population with a family history of breast cancer.
Yu J; Park A; Morris E; Liberman L; Borgen PI; King TA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):452-61. PubMed ID: 18026801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer detection: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of women from Pennsylvania.
Rutledge DN; Barsevick A; Knobf MT; Bookbinder M
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2001 Jul; 28(6):1032-40. PubMed ID: 11475877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Good results in periodic screening in women with increased risk of breast cancer; retrospective study].
Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Bartels CC; Obdeijn AI; Kuenen-Boumeester V; Klijn JG; Oudkerk M
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Mar; 139(9):445-9. PubMed ID: 7891766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast self-examination: defining a cohort still in need.
Wilke LG; Broadwater G; Rabiner S; Owens E; Yoon S; Ghate S; Scott V; Walsh R; Baker J; Soo MS; Ibarra-Drendall C; Stouder A; Robertson S; Barron A; Seewaldt V
Am J Surg; 2009 Oct; 198(4):575-9. PubMed ID: 19800471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Leutner CC; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Wardelmann E; Fimmers R; Kuhn W; Schild HH
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(33):8469-76. PubMed ID: 16293877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Breast self-examination also valuable in women participating in a screening programme].
Zonderhuis BM; Meijer S; Been J; Groot JJ; Langenhorst F; van den Tol MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2341-5. PubMed ID: 19024066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer?
Fenton JJ; Barton MB; Geiger AM; Herrinton LJ; Rolnick SJ; Harris EL; Barlow WE; Reisch LM; Fletcher SW; Elmore JG
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):67-71. PubMed ID: 16287888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Method of discovery of breast cancer.
Benedict S; Williams RD; Hoomani J
Cancer Pract; 1996; 4(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 8826143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]