BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9361930)

  • 1. Efficacy and side-effects of cyclosporine dose monitoring with levels 6 h after the morning dose in heart transplant patients.
    Cantarovich M; Besner JG; Fitchett DH; Latter DA
    Clin Transplant; 1997 Oct; 11(5 Pt 1):399-405. PubMed ID: 9361930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of measured trough levels and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited sampling strategies for monitoring mycophenolic acid exposure in stable heart transplant patients receiving cyclosporin A-containing and cyclosporin A-free immunosuppressive regimens.
    Dösch AO; Ehlermann P; Koch A; Remppis A; Katus HA; Dengler TJ
    Clin Ther; 2006 Jun; 28(6):893-905. PubMed ID: 16860172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Everolimus and reduced cyclosporine trough levels in maintenance heart transplant recipients.
    Schweiger M; Wasler A; Prenner G; Stiegler P; Stadlbauer V; Schwarz M; Tscheliessnigg K
    Transpl Immunol; 2006 Jun; 16(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 16701176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results.
    Krämer BK; Montagnino G; Del Castillo D; Margreiter R; Sperschneider H; Olbricht CJ; Krüger B; Ortuño J; Köhler H; Kunzendorf U; Stummvoll HK; Tabernero JM; Mühlbacher F; Rivero M; Arias M;
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 May; 20(5):968-73. PubMed ID: 15741208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimization of maintenance immunosuppression early after renal transplantation: an interim analysis.
    Bemelman FJ; de Maar EF; Press RR; van Kan HJ; ten Berge IJ; Homan van der Heide JJ; de Fijter HW
    Transplantation; 2009 Aug; 88(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 19667948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early cyclosporine C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo kidney transplant patients: a prospective randomized single-center pilot study.
    Kyllönen LE; Salmela KT
    Transplantation; 2006 Apr; 81(7):1010-5. PubMed ID: 16612277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation].
    Roy A; Grant DR; Kneteman NM; Tchervenkov JI; Levy GA; Tan A; Hendricks L
    Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Co-administration of diltiazem and cyclosporine for kidney transplant recipients: a four year follow-up study.
    Ingsathit A; Sumethkul V; Chalermsanyakorn P; Jirasiritham S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89 Suppl 2():S235-41. PubMed ID: 17044477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of neoral 2-hour postdose concentration monitoring versus tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring in de novo liver transplant recipients.
    Shenoy S; Hardinger KL; Crippin J; Korenblat K; Lisker-Melman M; Lowell JA; Chapman W
    Liver Transpl; 2008 Feb; 14(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 18236391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy.
    Cantarovich M; Besner JG; Barkun JS; Elstein E; Loertscher R
    Clin Transplant; 1998 Jun; 12(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 9642517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term improvement in renal function with sirolimus after early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplant recipients: 2-year results of the Rapamune Maintenance Regimen Study.
    Oberbauer R; Kreis H; Johnson RW; Mota A; Claesson K; Ruiz JC; Wilczek H; Jamieson N; Henriques AC; Paczek L; Chapman J; Burke JT;
    Transplantation; 2003 Jul; 76(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 12883194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiac allograft rejection: do trough cyclosporine levels correlate with the grade of histologic rejection?
    el Gamel A; Keevil B; Rahman A; Campbell C; Deiraniya A; Yonan N
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 1997 Mar; 16(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 9087869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FK506 effectiveness in reducing acute rejection after heart transplantation: a prospective randomized study.
    Rinaldi M; Pellegrini C; Martinelli L; Goggi C; Gavazzi A; Campana C; Arbustini E; Grossi P; Regazzi M; Ippoliti G; Vigano M
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 1997 Oct; 16(10):1001-10. PubMed ID: 9361242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induction therapy with cyclosporine without cytolytic agents results in a low incidence of acute rejection without significant renal impairment in heart transplant patients.
    Jazzar A; Fagiuoli S; Sisson S; Zuhdi N; Cooper DK
    Clin Transplant; 1995 Aug; 9(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 7579743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coadministration of ketoconazole and cyclosporine for kidney transplant recipients: long-term follow-up and study of metabolic consequences.
    Sobh MA; Hamdy AF; El Agroudy AE; El Sayed K; El-Diasty T; Bakr MA; Ghoneim MA
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2001 Mar; 37(3):510-7. PubMed ID: 11228175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An open randomized study comparing immunosuppression therapy initiated before or after kidney transplantation in haploidentical living recipients.
    Câmara NO; Dias MF; Pacheco-Silva A
    Clin Transplant; 2004 Aug; 18(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 15233825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advantages of C2 monitoring to avoid acute rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
    Schubert S; Abdul-Khaliq H; Lehmkuhl HB; Hübler M; Abd El Rahman MY; Miera O; Ewert P; Weng Y; Wei H; Krüdewagen B; Hetzer R; Berger F
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 Jun; 25(6):619-25. PubMed ID: 16730566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can cyclosporine blood level be reduced to half after heart transplantation?
    Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Huang SC; Wu IH; Wang CH; Yu HY; Chen YS; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Shun CT
    Transplant Proc; 2010 Apr; 42(3):930-3. PubMed ID: 20430207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus.
    Levy G; Grazi GL; Sanjuan F; Wu Y; Mühlbacher F; Samuel D; Friman S; Jones R; Cantisani G; Villamil F; Cillo U; Clavien PA; Klintmalm G; Otto G; Pollard S; McCormick PA
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1464-72. PubMed ID: 17004259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
    Hmiel SP; Canter C; Shepherd R; Lassa-Claxton S; Nadler M
    Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Aug; 11(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 17631021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.