These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9362593)
21. Use of the PUSH tool to measure venous ulcer healing. Ratliff CR; Rodeheaver GT Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 May; 51(5):58-60, 62-3. PubMed ID: 16014985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pressure ulcer grading tools: how reliable are they? Sharp A J Wound Care; 2004 Feb; 13(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 14999993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MDS+ RAP items associated with pressure ulcer prevalence in newly institutionalized elderly: study I. Zulkowski K Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Nov; 44(11):40-4, 46-8, 50, passim. PubMed ID: 9919294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The PUSH tool: a survey to determine its perceived usefulness. Berlowitz DR; Ratliff C; Cuddigan J; Rodeheaver GT; Adv Skin Wound Care; 2005; 18(9):480-3. PubMed ID: 16365545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Wound evaluation in decubitus ulcer. Assessment and differentiation]. Danzer S Pflege Z; 2012 Dec; 65(12):714-6. PubMed ID: 23330271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient, wound, and treatment characteristics associated with healing in pressure ulcers. Kramer JD; Kearney M Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11061706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using principal component analysis to describe wound status. Bartolucci AA; Thomas DR Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):93-5. PubMed ID: 9362590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pressure ulcer PUSH score and traditional nursing assessment in nursing home residents: do they correlate? George-Saintilus E; Tommasulo B; Cal CE; Hussain R; Mathew N; Dlugacz Y; Pekmezaris R; Wolf-Klein G J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2009 Feb; 10(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19187884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing and grading pressure ulcers. Nurs Stand; 2000 May 3-9; 14(33):2p.. PubMed ID: 11975252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Photography as an adjunct in pressure ulcer documentation. Dufrene C Crit Care Nurs Q; 2009; 32(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 19300069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Best practice in wound assessment. Miller M Community Nurse; 1996 Apr; 2(3):41-2, 44, 47. PubMed ID: 9445701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting. Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A conceptual model of pressure ulcer prevalence: MDS+ items and nutrition. Zulkowski K Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Feb; 45(2):36-8, 40, 42-4. PubMed ID: 10223013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Validation of two scales for evaluation of the risk of decubitus ulcer: Gosnell and Nova-4]. García Fernández FP; Bermejo Cobo J; Pérez Catalán MJ; Ramírez Pérez C; Fernández Romo MA; Cano Luque MC; Luque Peña J; Cabrera Espinosa M; Pancorbo Hidalgo PL Rev Enferm; 1999 Oct; 22(10):suppl 685-7. PubMed ID: 10745869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Controversies in classifying and assessing grade I pressure ulcers. Bethell E J Wound Care; 2003 Jan; 12(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12572234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pressure ulcer assessment and management. Ratliff CR; Rodeheaver GT Lippincotts Prim Care Pract; 1999; 3(2):242-58. PubMed ID: 10426069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]