221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9362729)
1. Peer review unmasked.
Brunier G
J CANNT; 1997; 7(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 9362729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ["Virtual reality" in published sciences?].
Niethard FU
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1996; 134(6):481-2. PubMed ID: 9027115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. "It's déjà vu all over again".
Greenebaum B
Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Dec; 24(8):529-30. PubMed ID: 14603471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The last judgment?].
Dunning AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Jan; 131(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 3821965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Where did the scientific method go?
Noseda M; McLean GR
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 18183010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to Where did the scientific method go?
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):29. PubMed ID: 18183012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reporting guidelines for research: curse or blessing?].
Ziegler A
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134(41):2077. PubMed ID: 19802770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Retraction of Scientific Writing.
Pollock NW
Wilderness Environ Med; 2020 Sep; 31(3):257-258. PubMed ID: 32826165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conflict in peer review.
Lawrence DJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 May; 13(4):177-8. PubMed ID: 2351879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
Senturia SD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Addressing conflicts of interest and clouding of objectivity: BJSM's "peer review: fair review" section.
Khan KM; Stovitz SD; Pluim B; Cook JL; Bahr R; Arendt EA; Noakes TD
Br J Sports Med; 2008 Feb; 42(2):79. PubMed ID: 18256294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Anonymous peer refereeing.
Nature; 1989 Jan; 337(6204):202. PubMed ID: 2911357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pretentious and deified papers].
Amato Neto V
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2003; 36(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 12806469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Unpleasant surprises: how the Introduction has wandered into the Discussion.
Wells WA
J Cell Biol; 2006 Sep; 174(6):741. PubMed ID: 16954351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
Fisher RS; Powers LE
Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.
Hoppeler H; Handel M; Moulton OC
J Exp Biol; 2008 Dec; 211(Pt 23):3651. PubMed ID: 19011202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Anonymous but irreplaceable experts in scientific journals].
Kontula K
Duodecim; 1993; 109(23-24):2181-3. PubMed ID: 7743970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
