These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9362729)

  • 21. [Not god enough, Ugeskriftet--and not satisfactory in these quality-conscious times].
    Jacobsen GK
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Jul; 163(27):3817-8. PubMed ID: 11466997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Review of manuscripts].
    Lock S
    Med Clin (Barc); 1992 Feb; 98(8):304-5. PubMed ID: 1560718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peer review: part of the writing process.
    Carlson K
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1990 Feb; 5(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 2355342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Editorial peer review in medicine.
    Lock S
    Recenti Prog Med; 1991 Jan; 82(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 2028075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Writing: visuals are another story.
    Dominiczak MH; McFall K
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):128. PubMed ID: 12853927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Writing: LEX and flexibility.
    Brent A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):128. PubMed ID: 12853928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The ugly side of peer review.
    Rothstein JM
    Phys Ther; 1995 Jul; 75(7):582-4. PubMed ID: 7604076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Writing for publication: a performance enhancement guide for the human services professional.
    Luiselli JK
    Behav Modif; 2010 Sep; 34(5):459-73. PubMed ID: 20935244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How CMAJ controls the quality of its scientific articles.
    Bolster A; Morgan PP
    CMAJ; 1986 Feb; 134(4):301-3. PubMed ID: 3942936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Courage could win back confidence in science.
    Daenke S
    Nature; 1999 Sep; 401(6751):321. PubMed ID: 10517622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Maintaining ethical standards in medical publishing.
    Youngs R; Kenyon G
    J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Jan; 120(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16375774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Words of wisdom worth reading aloud.
    Solomon VS
    Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7166):27. PubMed ID: 17972857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The quality of publications].
    Jiménez Villa J
    Aten Primaria; 1996 Apr; 17(6):367-8. PubMed ID: 8672639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6224):414. PubMed ID: 2725672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Best practice in the submission of a manuscript.
    Roberts J
    Headache; 2009 Apr; 49 Suppl 2():S58-65. PubMed ID: 19356162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Appetite: peer-reviewed research across the disciplines.
    Booth D
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):231-2. PubMed ID: 18455264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peer review: when enough is enough.
    Kim MJ
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1994; 26(4):257. PubMed ID: 7829108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Keeping the record straight.
    Shulman A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2001; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14964947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.