These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9362729)

  • 41. [Peer review].
    Boer EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Dec; 133(49):2455-9. PubMed ID: 2594115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The trouble with replication.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A review of peer review.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 1997 Sep; 22(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 9410930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Writing a literature review article.
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 80(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 19005101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Throw it away, Sam: the controlled circulation journals.
    Rennie D; Bero LA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 2119127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Judging words rather than journals or authors: a reminder that peer review continues after publication.
    Erren TC
    QJM; 2007 Dec; 100(12):799-800. PubMed ID: 18089546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The manuscript review process of nursing journals.
    Swanson E; McCloskey JC
    Image (IN); 1982 Oct; 14(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 6922826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The qualitative portfolio at The Gerontologist: strong and getting stronger.
    Schoenberg NE; Miller EA; Pruchno R
    Gerontologist; 2011 Jun; 51(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 21576704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Debunking minimum information myths: one hat need not fit all.
    Orchard S; Taylor CF
    N Biotechnol; 2009 Apr; 25(4):171-2. PubMed ID: 19150420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6240):275. PubMed ID: 2797137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Am I flogging a dead metaphor? Sloppy scholarship and the implied spider.
    McKenzie R
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2005 Oct; 12(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 16164505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Journal peer review.
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Aug; 313(7):455-6. PubMed ID: 4022077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How to revise an article.
    Morse JM
    Qual Health Res; 2004 Apr; 14(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 15068572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Checklists for excellence.
    Ketchum P
    Can Fam Physician; 1998 Oct; 44():2193-201, 2204-12. PubMed ID: 9805176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Fragmented publication.
    Gaberson KB
    AORN J; 2007 Apr; 85(4):714-5. PubMed ID: 17418128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ensuring inclusion of research reports in systematic reviews.
    Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S60-9. PubMed ID: 19892076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
    de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.