BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9365386)

  • 1. Graphical interpretation of analytical data from comparison of a field method with reference method by use of difference plots.
    Petersen PH; Stöckl D; Blaabjerg O; Pedersen B; Birkemose E; Thienpont L; Lassen JF; Kjeldsen J
    Clin Chem; 1997 Nov; 43(11):2039-46. PubMed ID: 9365386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple, graphical method to evaluate laboratory assays.
    Krouwer JS; Monti KL
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Aug; 33(8):525-7. PubMed ID: 8547437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytical goals developed from the inherent error of medical tests.
    Ross JW; Fraser MD
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1481-93; discussion 1493-4. PubMed ID: 8330410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Valid analytical performance specifications for combined analytical bias and imprecision for the use of common reference intervals.
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Lund F; Fraser CG; Sandberg S; Sölétormos G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2018 Sep; 55(5):612-615. PubMed ID: 29310466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transferability of clinical laboratory data within a health care region.
    Olafsdottir E; Aronsson T; Groth T; De Verdier CH
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1992 Nov; 52(7):679-87. PubMed ID: 1455162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new concept for quality control of clinical laboratory investigations in the light of clinical requirements and based on reference method values.
    Stamm D
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1982 Nov; 20(11):817-24. PubMed ID: 7153719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance profiles: new tools for characterization and comparison of clinical chemical results.
    Keller H; Passing H
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1989 Sep; 27(9):613-29. PubMed ID: 2607322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical quality specifications for common reference intervals.
    Ricós C; Doménech MV; Perich C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):858-62. PubMed ID: 15327023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality assurance system in clinical chemistry.
    Albertini A; Signorini C
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1995; 31(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 8546372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some concepts and principles of clinical test evaluation. Classification, analytical performance, monitoring and clinical interpretation. Working Group for the Nordic Clinical Chemistry Project (NORDKEM).
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1992; 208():3-132. PubMed ID: 1509230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Feb; 52():112-116. PubMed ID: 29107011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Allowable imprecision for laboratory tests based on clinical and analytical test outcome criteria.
    Westgard JO; Seehafer JJ; Barry PL
    Clin Chem; 1994 Oct; 40(10):1909-14. PubMed ID: 7923771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Description of a generally applicable model for the evaluation of uncertainty of measurement in clinical chemistry.
    Kristiansen J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Oct; 39(10):920-31. PubMed ID: 11758604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cholesterol operational process specifications for assuring the quality required by CLIA proficiency testing.
    Westgard JO; Wiebe DA
    Clin Chem; 1991 Nov; 37(11):1938-44. PubMed ID: 1934469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test result variation and the quality of evidence-based clinical guidelines.
    Fraser CG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15234632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of analytical quality on establishing common reference intervals and their use.
    Rustad P; Hyltoft Petersen P
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 15223703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expressing analytical performance from multi-sample evaluation in laboratory EQA.
    Thelen MHM; Jansen RTP; Weykamp CW; Steigstra H; Meijer R; Cobbaert CM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Aug; 55(10):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 28182577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cholesterol--a model system to relate medical needs with analytical performance.
    Wiebe DA; Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1504-12; discussion 1512-3. PubMed ID: 8330412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analytical goals for accuracy and precision of plasma creatinine determinations evaluated by reference method measurements.
    Linnet K
    Ups J Med Sci; 1993; 98(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 7974865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of criteria for the evaluation of reference method values.
    Stöckl D; Reinauer H
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993; 212():16-8. PubMed ID: 8465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.