BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9366338)

  • 1. Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Fesseha T; Sakr W; Grignon D; Banerjee M; Wood DP; Pontes JE
    J Urol; 1997 Dec; 158(6):2176-9. PubMed ID: 9366338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
    Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
    Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of Anterior and Lateral Extraprostatic Extensions with Base-Positive Resection Margins in Prostate Cancer.
    Kang YJ; Abalajon MJ; Jang WS; Kwon JK; Yoon CY; Lee JY; Cho KS; Ham WS; Choi YD
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158922. PubMed ID: 27391650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma.
    Cheng L; Darson MF; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Myers RP; Bostwick DG
    Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1775-82. PubMed ID: 10547551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
    Kausik SJ; Blute ML; Sebo TJ; Leibovich BC; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Zincke H
    Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of focal and diffuse extraprostatic extension and positive surgical margins on biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy.
    Billis A; Meirelles LL; Freitas LL; Magna LA; Reis LO; Ferreira U
    Int Braz J Urol; 2012; 38(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22555042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Eastham JA; Kattan MW; Riedel E; Begg CB; Wheeler TM; Gerigk C; Gonen M; Reuter V; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2292-5. PubMed ID: 14634399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
    Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted.
    Pierorazio PM; Epstein JI; Humphreys E; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 19914651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of positive apical surgical margins on likelihood of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Kordan Y; Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Cookson MS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Barocas DA
    J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2695-701. PubMed ID: 19836759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection.
    Gao X; Mohideen N; Flanigan RC; Waters WB; Wojcik EM; Leman CR
    J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1982-6. PubMed ID: 11061896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson W; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Elashoff D; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2142-6. PubMed ID: 12771736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens assessed by digital image analysis software correlates with other prognostic factors.
    Sherwin JC; Mirmilstein G; Pedersen J; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Mills J
    J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1808-14. PubMed ID: 20303103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Recurrence following radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Analysis of clinical, biological and anatomo-pathological prognostic factors].
    Feyaerts A; Delrée A; Lorge F; Opsomer RJ; Wese FX; Van Cangh PJ; Draguet AP; Cosyns JP
    Acta Urol Belg; 1997 Mar; 65(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9245198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic implications of partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: comparison of 3 methods.
    Iremashvili V; Lokeshwar SD; Jorda M; Pelaez L; Soloway MS
    J Urol; 2013 Jul; 190(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 23246479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.
    Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.