122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9366338)
21. Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone.
Mian BM; Troncoso P; Okihara K; Bhadkamkar V; Johnston D; Reyes AO; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 11912386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor.
Epstein JI; Pound CR; Partin AW; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1998 Jul; 160(1):97-100; discussion 101. PubMed ID: 9628613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shuford MD; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Shintani AK; Tsiatis A; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 15201750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy: detailed pathological analysis and prognosis.
Watson RB; Civantos F; Soloway MS
Urology; 1996 Jul; 48(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 8693658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.
Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The presence of benign prostatic glandular tissue at surgical margins does not predict PSA recurrence.
Kernek KM; Koch MO; Daggy JK; Juliar BE; Cheng L
J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):725-8. PubMed ID: 15976340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Molecular determination of surgical margins using fossa biopsies at radical prostatectomy.
Theodorescu D; Frierson HF; Sikes RA
J Urol; 1999 May; 161(5):1442-8. PubMed ID: 10210369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection.
Stamey TA; Villers AA; McNeal JE; Link PC; Freiha FS
J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1166-72; discussion 1172-3. PubMed ID: 2342177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins.
Simon MA; Kim S; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2006 Jan; 175(1):140-4; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 16406892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Location of extraprostatic extension and positive surgical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens].
Sakamoto N; Kagawa Y; Tanaka S; Iguchi A; Hasegawa Y; Koga H; Naito S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 95(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 14978940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Residual prostatic tumour in the surgical bed following radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: possible prognostic significance.
Valotto C; Falconieri G; Pizzolitto S; Cerruto MA; Brondani G; De Gobbi A; Zattoni F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Jun; 83(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 21826879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 1):1943-8; discussion 1948-9. PubMed ID: 11371886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Caveolin-1 expression is a predictor of recurrence-free survival in pT2N0 prostate carcinoma diagnosed in Japanese patients.
Satoh T; Yang G; Egawa S; Addai J; Frolov A; Kuwao S; Timme TL; Baba S; Thompson TC
Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 12599229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Prognostic value of the localization of positive resection margins after radical prostatectomy for intraprostatic tumors].
Sebe P; Makhoul B; Audet JF; Chopin D; Abbou CC; Salomon L
Prog Urol; 2003 Jun; 13(3):425-9. PubMed ID: 12940194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Ohori M; Wheeler TM; Kattan MW; Goto Y; Scardino PT
J Urol; 1995 Nov; 154(5):1818-24. PubMed ID: 7563355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
