138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9366458)
1. Difficult or impossible ventilation after sufentanil-induced anesthesia is caused primarily by vocal cord closure.
Bennett JA; Abrams JT; Van Riper DF; Horrow JC
Anesthesiology; 1997 Nov; 87(5):1070-4. PubMed ID: 9366458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ventilatory compliance after three sufentanil-pancuronium induction sequences.
Horrow JC; Abrams JT; Van Riper DF; Lambson DL; Storella RJ
Anesthesiology; 1991 Dec; 75(6):969-74. PubMed ID: 1835824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upper airway closure: a primary source of difficult ventilation with sufentanil induction of anesthesia.
Abrams JT; Horrow JC; Bennett JA; Van Riper DF; Storella RJ
Anesth Analg; 1996 Sep; 83(3):629-32. PubMed ID: 8780294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Sudden vocal cord closure during general anesthesia using remifentanil].
Kohno T; Ikoma M
Masui; 2008 Oct; 57(10):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18975534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fentanyl-O2-N2O rigidity and pulmonary compliance.
Scamman FL
Anesth Analg; 1983 Mar; 62(3):332-4. PubMed ID: 6829933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Sufentanil: the effect on cardiocirculatory parameters and intubation conditions on administration of pancuronium or vecuronium].
Janik R; Dick W
Anaesthesist; 1989 Dec; 38(12):673-80. PubMed ID: 2575875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Fentanyl versus sufentanil basic anesthesia. Hypnotic effect, muscle rigidity and efficacy of competitive muscle relaxants].
Eberle B; Brandt L; Hennes HJ; el-Gindi M; Ellmauer S; Dick W
Anaesthesist; 1989 Jul; 38(7):341-7. PubMed ID: 2570535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adducted vocal cords relieved by neuromuscular blocking drug: a cause of impaired mechanical ventilation when using a laryngeal mask airway: two photographically documented cases.
Ghimouz A; Lentschener C; Goater P; Borne M; Esteve M
J Clin Anesth; 2014 Dec; 26(8):668-70. PubMed ID: 25439406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microcirculatory alterations induced by sedation in intensive care patients. Effects of midazolam alone and in association with sufentanil.
Lamblin V; Favory R; Boulo M; Mathieu D
Crit Care; 2006; 10(6):R176. PubMed ID: 17173680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vocal cord closure. A cause of upper airway obstruction during controlled ventilation.
Scharf SM; Feldman NT; Goldman MD; Haut HZ; Bruce E; Ingram RH
Am Rev Respir Dis; 1978 Feb; 117(2):391-7. PubMed ID: 273387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Truncal rigidity as a result of epidural sufentanil--a case report.
Mao CC; Chang WK; Huang YC; Poon KS; Chan KH; Lee TY
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1997 Sep; 35(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 9407685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Facemask ventilation and vocal cord angle following neuromuscular blockade: a prospective observational study
Lee MK; Kim KN; Jeong MA; Kim SY; Oh MS; Kwon BS
Anaesthesia; 2022 Sep; 77(9):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 35727620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Time window for intubation after rocuronium administration during target-controlled infusion of propofol and sulfentanil].
Gu MN; Wang M; Qin ZS; Xiao JF; Tang JJ; Xu JS
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 May; 27(5):685-7. PubMed ID: 17545090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dexmedetomidine-midazolam versus Sufentanil-midazolam for Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-blind Study.
Li CW; Li YD; Tian HT; Kong XG; Chen K
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Dec; 128(23):3143-8. PubMed ID: 26612286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time to extubation during propofol anesthesia for spine surgery with sufentanil compared with fentanyl: a retrospective cohort study.
Subramanian A; Wanta BT; Fogelson JL; Curry TB; Hannon JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(21):1758-64. PubMed ID: 25010093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Level concept of analgesic dosing in intensive care medicine with sufentanil].
Wappler F; Scholz J; Prause A; Möllenberg O; Bause H; Schulte am Esch J
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1998 Jan; 33(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 9530479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of sufentanil and fentanyl for surgical repair of congenital cardiac defects.
Prakanrattana U; Suksompong S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Sep; 85 Suppl 3():S807-14. PubMed ID: 12452216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vocal cord function and bispectral index in pediatric bronchoscopy patients emerging from propofol anesthesia.
Schroeck H; Fecho K; Abode K; Bailey A
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2010 May; 45(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 20425858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intranasal midazolam or sufentanil for preinduction of anesthesia in pediatric patients.
Karl HW; Keifer AT; Rosenberger JL; Larach MG; Ruffle JM
Anesthesiology; 1992 Feb; 76(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 1531286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: efficacy and safety of remifentanil versus sufentanil.
Lison S; Schill M; Conzen P
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Feb; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17289477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
