These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9366721)

  • 1. Clinical experience with a controlled-release, prostaglandin E2 intravaginal insert in the USA.
    Rayburn WF
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Oct; 104 Suppl 15():8-12; discussion 20-5. PubMed ID: 9366721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
    Veerman HM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jan; 149(2):105-6; author reply 106. PubMed ID: 15688844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misoprostol for term labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Saeed GA; Fakhar S; Nisar N; Alam AY
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 50(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 21482368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
    Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening/labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; DiMarco CS; Ramin KD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 12854926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of dinoprostone vaginal insert beyond 12 hours for induction of labor.
    Brennan MC; Pevzner L; Wing DA; Powers BL; Rayburn WF
    Am J Perinatol; 2011 Jun; 28(6):479-84. PubMed ID: 21225563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
    Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone for cervical ripening--a review of current evidence in hospital and outpatient settings.
    Rath W
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 16318611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of labor and pain: a randomized trial between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.
    Zanconato G; Bergamini V; Mantovani E; Carlin R; Bortolami O; Franchi M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):728-31. PubMed ID: 21351838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A resource audit of labour induction at two hospitals in the UK.
    Robson MS; Paterson-Brown S; Maslen T; Holmes J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Oct; 104 Suppl 15():13-9; discussion 20-5. PubMed ID: 9366722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of patients' satisfaction of cervical ripening using dinoprostone by either intravaginal gel or pessary: an open-label, randomized, prospective study.
    Ferraiolo A; Dellacasa I; Bentivoglio G; Ferrero S; Ragni N
    J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(9-10):423-9. PubMed ID: 21043369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evidence-based medicine: labor induction with prostaglandins].
    Winkler M; Rath W
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1999 Dec; 203 Suppl 2():6-11. PubMed ID: 10612191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is expensive always better? Comparison of two induction agents for term rupture of membranes.
    Parisaei M; Erskine KJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18569470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Structural sensitivity analysis].
    Carrera-Hueso FJ; Ramón-Barrios A
    Farm Hosp; 2011 May; 35 Suppl 2():10-7. PubMed ID: 22445504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal misoprostol for term labor induction.
    Bauer TA; Brown DL; Chai LK
    Ann Pharmacother; 1997 Nov; 31(11):1391-3. PubMed ID: 9391696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intravaginal dinoprostone versus intra cervical foley catheter for induction of labor.
    Jalilian N; Fakheri T; Ghadami MR
    Acta Med Iran; 2011; 49(12):831. PubMed ID: 22174175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone Propess for labor induction].
    Mazouni C; Provensal M; Ménard JP; Heckenroth H; Guidicelli B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jun; 34(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 16713322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.