These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9367161)

  • 1. In defence of small science.
    Sachs F
    Nature; 1997 Nov; 390(6656):203. PubMed ID: 9367161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rethinking grant review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 11(2):119. PubMed ID: 18227790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1255-7. PubMed ID: 11701895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review: NIH urged to streamline bids..
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6486):170-1. PubMed ID: 8028655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National Science Foundation. Meeting for peer review at a resort that's virtually free.
    Bohannon J
    Science; 2011 Jan; 331(6013):27. PubMed ID: 21212335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review. NIH urged to focus on new ideas, new applicants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1169. PubMed ID: 18309051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NIH needs a makeover.
    Dey SK
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National Institutes of Health. Grants 'below payline' rise to help new investigators.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5948):1607. PubMed ID: 19779159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Varmus speaks out on need to boost clinical research.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):118. PubMed ID: 7969431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize.
    Berg JM
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18276870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preparing effective grant applications.
    Arnett DK
    Circulation; 2009 Dec; 120(25):2607-12. PubMed ID: 20026793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomedical politics. Sex studies 'properly' approved.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):741. PubMed ID: 14764836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize. Response.
    Capecchi MR
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18283726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.