BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9367229)

  • 21. Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?
    Liberman MC; Zuo J; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 15478431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term stability between click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: A comparison.
    Hoshino M; Ueda H; Nakata S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10450050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the effect of cochlear perfusion with ouabain on summating potentials and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig.
    Klis SF; Rebillard G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1995; 252(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 8562035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Degeneration of sensory outer hair cells following pharmacological blockade of cochlear KCNQ channels in the adult guinea pig.
    Nouvian R; Ruel J; Wang J; Guitton MJ; Pujol R; Puel JL
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Jun; 17(12):2553-62. PubMed ID: 12823462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Regulation of dopamine D2 receptors in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Wang L; Li J; Yu L; Li X
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):738-43. PubMed ID: 24807851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Mice Above and Below the Eliciting Primaries.
    Cheatham MA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 24(4):413-428. PubMed ID: 37464091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Loud sound-induced changes in cochlear mechanics.
    Fridberger A; Zheng J; Parthasarathi A; Ren T; Nuttall A
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Nov; 88(5):2341-8. PubMed ID: 12424275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emissions in the rat.
    Lenoir M; Puel JL
    Hear Res; 1987; 29(2-3):265-71. PubMed ID: 3624087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of treatment with vincristine on transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Riga M; Psarommatis I; Korres S; Lyra Ch; Papadeas E; Varvutsi M; Ferekidis E; Apostolopoulos N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1003-8. PubMed ID: 16359737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Concurrent Acoustic Activation of the Medial Olivocochlear System Modifies the After-Effects of Intense Low-Frequency Sound on the Human Inner Ear.
    Kugler K; Wiegrebe L; Gürkov R; Krause E; Drexl M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 16(6):713-25. PubMed ID: 26264256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence that inner hair cells are the major source of cochlear summating potentials.
    Zheng XY; Ding DL; McFadden SL; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):76-88. PubMed ID: 9387987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigation of the 2f
    Wen H; Bowling T; Meaud J
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():127-140. PubMed ID: 29801982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cochlear microphonic enhancement in two tone interactions.
    Nuttall AL; Dolan DF
    Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 51(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 2032959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.
    Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 8150746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products.
    Brown DJ; Hartsock JJ; Gill RM; Fitzgerald HE; Salt AN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2129-45. PubMed ID: 19354389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Slow oscillatory changes of DPOAE magnitude and phase after exposure to intense low-frequency sounds.
    Ueberfuhr MA; Drexl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jul; 122(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 31042448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Non-linear aspects of outer hair cell transduction and the temporary threshold shifts after acoustic trauma.
    Patuzzi R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11914520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of kainic acid on the cochlear potentials and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla.
    Zheng XY; Wang J; Salvi RJ; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 95(1-2):161-7. PubMed ID: 8793517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.