301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9367237)
1. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli.
Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 9367237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following acute electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: III. Capacitive versus non-capacitive coupling of the stimulating electrodes.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK; Seligman PM; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 9508028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. IV. Effects of stimulus intensity.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 132(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 10392548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute study on the neuronal excitability of the cochlear nuclei of the guinea pig following electrical stimulation.
Liu X; McPhee G; Seldon HL; Clark GM
Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 9199522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
Liu A; Wang Z; Cui Y; Zhou L; Chi F
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
Shepherd RK; Javel E
Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.
Prado-Guitierrez P; Fewster LM; Heasman JM; McKay CM; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 16644157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Martin RL; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment.
Hu N; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC; Abkes BA; Nichols JM
Hear Res; 2003 Nov; 185(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 14599695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
Shepherd RK; Javel E
Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: duration effects.
Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):7-14. PubMed ID: 18692121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
