These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9368104)

  • 1. A simple method for automatically locating the nipple on mammograms.
    Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):483-94. PubMed ID: 9368104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method.
    Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangieri FF; Pepe ML; Rangayyan RM
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):948-57. PubMed ID: 23508373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust initial detection of landmarks in film-screen mammograms using multiple FFDM atlases.
    Iglesias JE; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1815-24. PubMed ID: 19520632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Radiomic feature-based Nipple Detection Algorithm on Digital Mammography.
    Jiang J; Zhang Y; Lu Y; Guo Y; Chen H
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4381-4391. PubMed ID: 31242321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Kinoshita SK; Azevedo-Marques PM; Pereira RR; Rodrigues JA; Rangayyan RM
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Mar; 21(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 17436047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chae SH; Jeong JW; Choi JH; Chae EY; Kim HH; Choi YW; Lee S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():113-120. PubMed ID: 28391808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Correa JL; Vidal JJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1996 May; 49(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8800610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A heuristic approach to automated nipple detection in digital mammograms.
    Jas M; Mukhopadhyay S; Chakraborty J; Sadhu A; Khandelwal N
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):932-40. PubMed ID: 23423610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic detection of the breast border and nipple position on digital mammograms using genetic algorithm for asymmetry approach to detection of microcalcifications.
    Karnan M; Thangavel K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Jul; 87(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 17543415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast tissue density quantification via digitized mammograms.
    Saha PK; Udupa JK; Conant EF; Chakraborty DP; Sullivan D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):792-803. PubMed ID: 11513030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography in the evaluation of nipple inversion.
    Kalbhen CL; Kezdi-Rogus PC; Dowling MP; Flisak ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 9423612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphological Area Gradient: System-independent Dense Tissue Segmentation in Mammography Images.
    Torres GF; Sassi A; Arponen O; Holli-Helenius K; Laaperi AL; Rinta-Kiikka I; Kamarainen J; Pertuz S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():4855-4858. PubMed ID: 31946948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated calculation of ptosis on lateral clinical photographs.
    Lee J; Kim E; Reece GP; Crosby MA; Beahm EK; Markey MK
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Oct; 21(5):900-10. PubMed ID: 26083280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D localization of clustered microcalcifications using cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique views.
    Yang SC; Hsu HH; Hsu GC; Chung PC; Guo SM; Lo CS; Yang CW; Lee SK; Chang CI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Oct; 29(7):521-32. PubMed ID: 15996852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic positioning: evaluation from the view box.
    Bassett LW; Hirbawi IA; DeBruhl N; Hayes MK
    Radiology; 1993 Sep; 188(3):803-6. PubMed ID: 8351351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nipple simulating a breast mass on a mammogram.
    Gilula LA; Destouet JM; Monsees B
    Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):272. PubMed ID: 2909108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of breast contour for nipple segmentation in breast magnetic resonance images.
    Gwo CY; Gwo A; Wei CH; Huang PJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):022304. PubMed ID: 24506642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thickness correction of mammographic images by means of a global parameter model of the compressed breast.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 15250632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.