BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 937059)

  • 1. Skin reaction as a biologic parameter for control of different dose schedules and gap correction.
    Turesson I; Notter G
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1976 Apr; 15(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 937059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin reaction as a biological parameter for prospective studies of different dose schedules with the CRE formula.
    Turesson I; Notter G
    Bull Cancer; 1976; 63(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Control of dose administered once a week and three times a day according to schedules calculated by the CRE formula, using skin reaction as a biological parameter.
    Turesson I; Notter G
    Radiology; 1976 Aug; 120(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 935493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of fraction size in radiotherapy on the late normal tissue reaction--I: Comparison of the effects of daily and once-a-week fractionation on human skin.
    Turesson I; Notter G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1984 May; 10(5):593-8. PubMed ID: 6735750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skin reactions after different fractionation schedules giving the same cumulative radiation effect.
    Turesson I; Notter G
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1975 Oct; 14(5):475-84. PubMed ID: 1202926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repair capacity and kinetics of human skin during fractionated radiotherapy: erythema, desquamation, and telangiectasia after 3 and 5 year's follow-up.
    Turesson I; Thames HD
    Radiother Oncol; 1989 Jun; 15(2):169-88. PubMed ID: 2762590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple small fractions per day versus conventional fractionation. Comparison of normal tissue reactions and effect on breast carcinoma.
    Notter G; Turesson I
    Radiother Oncol; 1984 Mar; 1(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 6505266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A quantitative study of late radiation effect on normal skin and subcutaneous tissues in human beings.
    Arcangeli G; Friedman M; Paoluzi R
    Br J Radiol; 1974 Jan; 47(553):44-50. PubMed ID: 4809425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of fraction size in radiotherapy on the late normal tissue reaction--II: Comparison of the effects of daily and twice-a-week fractionation on human skin.
    Turesson I; Notter G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1984 May; 10(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 6429092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of the overall treatment time in radiotherapy on the acute reaction: comparison of the effects of daily and twice-a-week fractionation on human skin.
    Turesson I; Notter G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1984 May; 10(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 6429093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Basal cell density in human skin for various fractionation schedules in radiotherapy.
    Nyman J; Turesson I
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Nov; 33(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 7708954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the interval between fractions matter in the range of 4-8 h in radiotherapy? A study of acute and late human skin reactions.
    Nyman J; Turesson I
    Radiother Oncol; 1995 Mar; 34(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 7631023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fibroblast radiosensitivity versus acute and late normal skin responses in patients treated for breast cancer.
    Brock WA; Tucker SL; Geara FB; Turesson I; Wike J; Nyman J; Peters LJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jul; 32(5):1371-9. PubMed ID: 7635777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective studies with the CRE formula of prolonged fractionation schedules.
    Notter G; Turesson I
    Radiology; 1976 Dec; 121(3 Pt. 1):709-15. PubMed ID: 981673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induced acute erythema and late pigmentation may not be correlated: in regards to Perera et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:1283-1290).
    Nemeskéri C; Póti Z; Mayer A; Trón L; Gulybán A; Sáfrány G; Esik O
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 May; 65(1):309-10. PubMed ID: 16618586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of patient to patient variation of skin erythema developing as a response to radiotherapy.
    Russell NS; Knaken H; Bruinvis IA; Hart AA; Begg AC; Lebesque JV
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Mar; 30(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 8209004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Underprediction of human skin erythema at low doses per fraction by the linear quadratic model.
    Hamilton CS; Denham JW; O'Brien M; Ostwald P; Kron T; Wright S; Drr W
    Radiother Oncol; 1996 Jul; 40(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8844884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of dose fractionation on acute and late reactions in patients with postoperative rasiotherapy for carcinoma of the breast.
    Kim JH; Chu FC; Hilaris B
    Cancer; 1975 Jun; 35(6):1583-6. PubMed ID: 1148992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for individual differences in the radiosensitivity of human skin.
    Tucker SL; Turesson I; Thames HD
    Eur J Cancer; 1992; 28A(11):1783-91. PubMed ID: 1389511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative radiation therapy in mammary carcinoma stage II. Target volume, organs at risk, absorbed dose, time-dose schedule, and dose to organs at risk in a prospective investigation.
    Arwidi A; Aspegren K; Augustsson NE; Hafström L; Norgren A; Svahn-Tapper G
    Acta Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Biol; 1979; 18(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 525444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.