These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9371080)
1. Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers. Rowan M; Huston P CMAJ; 1997 Nov; 157(10):1442-6. PubMed ID: 9371080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The qualitative research methodology. Saddler D Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18300830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How to critique qualitative research articles. Forchuk C; Roberts J Can J Nurs Res; 1993; 25(4):47-55; quiz 56. PubMed ID: 10603806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to assess rigour . . . or not in qualitative papers. Sale JE J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):912-3. PubMed ID: 19018925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Advice on writing an abstract for a scientific meeting and on the evaluation of abstracts by selection committees. Taboulet P Eur J Emerg Med; 2000 Mar; 7(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 10839383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Critiquing research for use in practice. Dale JC J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15867836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Upgrading our instructions for authors. Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles. Froman RD; Schmitt MH Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research. Henly SJ; Dougherty MC Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review of nursing research proposals. Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection]. Clarke SP Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of published articles in CAJM. Nystrom L Cent Afr J Med; 1998 Oct; 44(10):264-5. PubMed ID: 10101438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomy of a research paper. Branson RD Respir Care; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1222-8. PubMed ID: 15447807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding and critiquing qualitative research papers. Lee P Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 18-24; 102(29):30-2. PubMed ID: 16895246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simplifying the process of research review for the novice researcher. Callihan D J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 18199936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Publishing in English-language journals. Davis AJ; Tschudin V Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time. Clarke SP Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Preparing and presenting a research poster. Wipke-Tevis DD; Williams DA J Vasc Nurs; 2002 Dec; 20(4):138-42. PubMed ID: 12469074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]