250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9371252)
1. A proposal to mobilize public opinion in support of the National Institutes of Health. Commentary.
Stossel TP
Curr Opin Hematol; 1994 Jan; 1(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9371252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Public input benefits NIH.
Novak K
Nat Med; 1999 Oct; 5(10):1097. PubMed ID: 10502841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. "Glocal" science advocacy.
Leshner AI
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):877. PubMed ID: 18276853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Public money, public values.
Abrams SE
Public Health Nurs; 2004; 21(6):511-2. PubMed ID: 15566554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Funding mechanisms for research through the National Cancer Institute.
Clifford CK
Cancer Res; 1993 May; 53(10 Suppl):2434s-2435s. PubMed ID: 8485731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. This is not your mentors' NIH--new strategies for research support.
Rivkees SA
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2006 Oct; 19(10):1187-9. PubMed ID: 17172079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic over-stimulation?
Johnston SC; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2009 Apr; 65(4):A7-8. PubMed ID: 19399856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Basic and clinical research: what is the most appropriate weighting in a public investment portfolio?
Johnston SC; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2006 Jul; 60(1):9A-11A. PubMed ID: 16802300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantum grants: request for applications from the NIBIB.
Harrington DP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):398-9. PubMed ID: 17412092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bush's budget boost puts NIH on target for doubled figures.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6871):459. PubMed ID: 11823811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer centers and cancer research: the need for recognition and increased funding.
Durbin RJ
Int J Cell Cloning; 1990 Nov; 8(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 2273294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Windfall warning.
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Responding to stimuli.
Mahapatra A
ACS Chem Biol; 2009 Apr; 4(4):233. PubMed ID: 19371128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biologists wary that cash up front could mean cuts later.
Check E
Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):677. PubMed ID: 12610581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Public funding of intellectual curiosity.
Schimmel P
IUBMB Life; 2000 Dec; 50(6):345-6. PubMed ID: 11327305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Report of the AFCR Public Policy Committee: current issues in public policy.
Clin Res; 1988 Sep; 36(5):507-9. PubMed ID: 3168402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. science policy. NIH stimulus plan triggers flood of applications--and anxiety.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):318-9. PubMed ID: 19372395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The stimulus package and medical therapeutics.
Somberg JC
Am J Ther; 2009; 16(2):105. PubMed ID: 19262356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
