These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 937160)

  • 1. Letter: Antisubstitution vs. cooperative substitution.
    Jones ME; Helling DK; Widmer RB
    Am Fam Physician; 1976 Jul; 14(1):27. PubMed ID: 937160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic issues in the antisubstitution controversy.
    Sharpe TR
    Am J Pharm Sci Support Public Health; 1977; 149(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 910879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physician-controlled source selection--a suggested approach to substitution.
    Chadwick BM
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Mar; 4(3):27-32. PubMed ID: 1083406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generic vs. brand name drugs--patients, pharmacists, physicians: caught in the middle.
    Felch WC
    Internist; 1979 May; 20(4):3-5. PubMed ID: 10242131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FTC: our model product selection law relies on the pharmacist's expertise.
    Holmes PD
    Pharm Times; 1979 Feb; 45(2):36-9. PubMed ID: 10240271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prescription versus cheapest drug substitution.
    Lepp BA; Defelice SL
    N Y State J Med; 1975 Jan; 75(1):133-5, 146. PubMed ID: 1053813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Substitution: expectations and realization.
    Gorrell JM
    Med Mark Media; 1981 May; 16(5):52, 54-7. PubMed ID: 10251529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In defense of the Drug Research Board.
    Azarnoff DL
    JAMA; 1975 Aug; 233(5):425-6. PubMed ID: 1173852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. States moving to allow generic substitution.
    Internist; 1979 May; 20(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 10242129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New York's generic drug substitution law.
    Kamen A
    N Y State Dent J; 1980 Nov; 46(9):599-604. PubMed ID: 6935574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More states adopt generic substitution laws.
    Goldsmith LS
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1977 Oct; 5(10):31-2. PubMed ID: 303272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drug product selection and the law.
    Fink JL
    Contemp Pharm Pract; 1979; 2(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 10242846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The high price of mandatory substitution.
    Dickinson J
    Hosp Formul; 1978 Oct; 13(10):811-2. PubMed ID: 10238813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drug substitution--boon to consumers versus legal trap for the professional.
    Brennan BJ
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Mar; 4(3):20-5. PubMed ID: 1083405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidelines for pharmacists performing product selection.
    Am Pharm; 1990 Jul; NS30(7):40-1. PubMed ID: 2363394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Ohio Generic Product Selection Law: influence on pharmacy practice.
    Hunter RH
    Med Mark Media; 1979 Jul; 14(7):33-6. PubMed ID: 10243269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forces and direction of drug product selection legislation.
    Stewart JE
    Med Mark Media; 1979 Jun; 14(6):34-6, 38-9. PubMed ID: 10242281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Additional generics on the market.
    FDA Drug Bull; 1986 Nov; 16(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 3817341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Philosophy, prescriptions, and politics.
    Bess DR
    JAMA; 1980 Feb; 243(6):525-7. PubMed ID: 7351782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How many patients still get the drug you prescribe?
    Rosenberg CL
    Med Econ; 1979 Sep; 56(18):35-6, 40, 44 passim. PubMed ID: 10243615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.