187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 937242)
1. Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team.
Looney GL
Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y); 1976; 4(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 937242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review of research project grants by NIH study sections: report of the Committee on National Medical Policy, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Bondurant S
Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 10304718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group.
Henley C
Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.
Henley C
Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Letter: Peer review system utilized by the NIH and the NSF.
Fed Proc; 1973 Dec; 32(12):2142-3. PubMed ID: 4753768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
Kirschstein RL
Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council.
Henley C
Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2335-8. PubMed ID: 892000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems.
Vivona S; Do van Quy D
Cancer Res; 1973 Apr; 33(4):919. PubMed ID: 4739656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Visceral viewpoints. Goals and controls - grants and contracts.
Spiro HM
N Engl J Med; 1975 Sep; 293(11):545-7. PubMed ID: 1152879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Remembering the peer in peer review.
O'Connell KA
Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH peer review system: facts and figures on study sections add up to trouble.
Fed Proc; 1978 Aug; 37(10):1a-4a. PubMed ID: 581073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.
Bucy PC
Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Moron peer review.
Brenner S
Curr Biol; 1999 Oct; 9(20):R755. PubMed ID: 10531042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The peer review system.
Paque RE
Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2350-1. PubMed ID: 7371872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The peer review system.
Homburger F
Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2349-50. PubMed ID: 7371871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The peer review system.
Rutman JF
Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2349. PubMed ID: 7371870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review reviewed.
Mehl JW
Fed Proc; 1975 Aug; 34(9):i-iv. PubMed ID: 1149887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Who reads your project-grant application to the National Institutes of Health?
Eaves GN
Fed Proc; 1972; 31(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 5009665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
