These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9372569)

  • 1. Quantitative acoustic characterization of a new surfactant-based ultrasound contrast agent.
    Forsberg F; Wu Y; Makin IR; Wang W; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(8):1201-8. PubMed ID: 9372569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of environmental conditions on a new surfactant-based contrast agent: ST68.
    Basude R; Duckworth JW; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 May; 26(4):621-8. PubMed ID: 10856625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast microbubbles: theory and in vivo measurements.
    Forsberg F; Basude R; Liu JB; Alessandro J; Shi WT; Rawool NM; Goldberg BB; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 25(8):1203-11. PubMed ID: 10576263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acoustic response of a novel 50:50 PLGA contrast agent.
    Wheatley MA; Forsberg F; Oum K; Ro R; El-Sherif D
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Nov; 44(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 16730047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preserving enhancement in freeze-dried contrast agent ST68: Examination of excipients.
    Solis C; Forsberg F; Wheatley MA
    Int J Pharm; 2010 Aug; 396(1-2):30-8. PubMed ID: 20540998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surfactant-stabilized contrast agent on the nanoscale for diagnostic ultrasound imaging.
    Wheatley MA; Forsberg F; Dube N; Patel M; Oeffinger BE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 32(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 16364800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and characterization of a nano-scale contrast agent.
    Oeffinger BE; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):343-7. PubMed ID: 15047309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of shell type on the in vivo backscatter from polymer-encapsulated microbubbles.
    Forsberg F; Lathia JD; Merton DA; Liu JB; Le NT; Goldberg BB; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1281-7. PubMed ID: 15582227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages.
    Basude R; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasonics; 2001 Oct; 39(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 11775659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preclinical acute toxicology study of surfactant-stabilized ultrasound contrast agents in adult rats.
    Forsberg F; Liu JB; Patel M; Liu L; Lin L; Solis C; Fox TB; Wheatley MA
    Int J Toxicol; 2010; 29(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 20008819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental acoustic characterization of an endoskeletal antibubble contrast agent: First results.
    Panfilova A; Chen P; van Sloun RJG; Wijkstra H; Postema M; Poortinga AT; Mischi M
    Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6765-6780. PubMed ID: 34580883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic characterization of a new trisacryl contrast agent. Part I: In vitro study.
    Lavisse S; Rouffiac V; Peronneau P; Paci A; Chaix C; Reb P; Roche A; Lassau N
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Mar; 48(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 18191433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel ultrasound contrast agent based on microbubbles generated from surfactant mixtures of Span 60 and polyoxyethylene 40 stearate.
    Xing Z; Ke H; Wang J; Zhao B; Yue X; Dai Z; Liu J
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Sep; 6(9):3542-9. PubMed ID: 20226284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of various agents in contrast enhancement of color Doppler flow images: an in vitro study.
    Fan P; Czuwala PJ; Nanda NC; Rosenthal SM; Yoganathan A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1993; 19(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 8456528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Contrast media in ultrasonography].
    Karstrup S; Juul NP
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 May; 161(20):2938-43. PubMed ID: 10354779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preparation of polyelectrolyte multilayer coated microbubbles for use as ultrasound contrast agent.
    Xing ZW; Ke HT; Liu SQ; Dail ZF; Wang JR; Liu JB
    Chin Med Sci J; 2008 Jun; 23(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 18686629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic and kinetic behaviour of definity in mice exposed to high frequency ultrasound.
    Stapleton S; Goodman H; Zhou YQ; Cherin E; Henkelman RM; Burns PN; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):296-307. PubMed ID: 18950930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parenchymal enhancement and tumor visualization using a new sonographic contrast agent.
    Forsberg F; Liu JB; Merton DA; Rawool NM; Goldberg BB
    J Ultrasound Med; 1995 Dec; 14(12):949-57. PubMed ID: 8583531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic characterization of a new trisacryl contrast agent. Part II: Flow phantom study and in vivo quantification.
    Lavisse S; Peronneau P; Rouffiac V; Paci A; Vigouroux J; Opolon P; Roche A; Lassau N
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Mar; 48(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 18191434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the relationship between microbubble fragmentation, deflation and broadband superharmonic signal production.
    Lindsey BD; Rojas JD; Dayton PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):1711-25. PubMed ID: 25766572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.