These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9372607)

  • 21. Using the past to predict the future.
    Dougherty MR; Scheck P; Nelson TO; Narens L
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1096-115. PubMed ID: 16496729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does delaying judgments of learning really improve the efficacy of study decisions? Not so much.
    Kimball DR; Smith TA; Muntean WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):923-54. PubMed ID: 22250913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do judgments of learning predict automatic influences of memory?
    Undorf M; Böhm S; Cüpper L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):882-96. PubMed ID: 26595068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When knowing more means less: the effect of fan on metamemory judgments.
    McGuire MJ; Maki RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1172-9. PubMed ID: 11550745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
    Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does Interactive Imagery Influence the Reactive Effect of Judgments of Learning on Memory?
    Witherby AE; Babineau AL; Tauber SK
    J Intell; 2023 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 37504782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process.
    Son LK; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1116-29. PubMed ID: 16496730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The testing effect as a function of explicit testing instructions and judgments of learning.
    Jönsson FU; Hedner M; Olsson MJ
    Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 22580409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1757-1775. PubMed ID: 32333106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Judgments of Learning in Context: Backgrounds Can Both Reduce and Produce Metamemory Illusions.
    Tatz JR; Peynircioğlu ZF
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):581-595. PubMed ID: 31732926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is retrieval the key? Metamemory judgment and testing as learning strategies.
    Akdoğan E; Izaute M; Danion JM; Vidailhet P; Bacon E
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1390-5. PubMed ID: 26606714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of metamemory after traumatic brain injury: predictions during verbal learning.
    Kennedy MR; Yorkston KM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1072-86. PubMed ID: 11063231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Metamemory adjustments over time in adults with and without traumatic brain injury.
    Krause M; Kennedy MR
    Brain Inj; 2009 Nov; 23(12):965-72. PubMed ID: 19831493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
    Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
    Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.