These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9372744)
21. An audit of breast cancer pathology reporting in Australia in 1995. Kricker A; Armstrong B; Smith C; Bilous M; Camaris C; Mayer A; Psarianos T Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(3-4):563-8. PubMed ID: 10408867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Deficiencies in pathological reporting of colorectal cancer in Victoria. Winn RD; Robinson DR; Farmer KC; Bell SW ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):796-9. PubMed ID: 18844912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for drafting of anatomic and surgical pathology reports or cytopathology reports in oncology]. Arnould L; Fiche M; Blanc-Vincent MP; Le Doussal V; Zafrani B; Gory-Delabaere G; Briffod M; Vielh P; Voigt JJ Bull Cancer; 2000 Feb; 87(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 10705287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Impact on the quality of pathology reports in the R2c cancer network: analysis of 4521 pathology reports of primary breast tumors]. Bardou VJ; Puig B; Jacquemier J; Giovannini MH Bull Cancer; 2006 Oct; 93(10):1033-8. PubMed ID: 17074662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany]. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of breast cancer treatment guidelines on surgeon practice patterns: results of a hospital-based intervention. Mor V; Laliberte LL; Petrisek AC; Intrator O; Wachtel T; Maddock PG; Bland KI Surgery; 2000 Nov; 128(5):847-61. PubMed ID: 11056451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center. Blayney DW; McNiff K; Hanauer D; Miela G; Markstrom D; Neuss M J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(23):3802-7. PubMed ID: 19487377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient evaluation of the hotel function of hospitals. Oz MC; Zikria J; Mutrie C; Slater JP; Scott C; Lehman S; Connolly MW; Asher DT; Ting W; Namerow PB Heart Surg Forum; 2001; 4(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 11544623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Foy JM; Earls MF Pediatrics; 2005 Jan; 115(1):e97-104. PubMed ID: 15629972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of incident reports by physicians and nurses to document medical errors in pediatric patients. Taylor JA; Brownstein D; Christakis DA; Blackburn S; Strandjord TP; Klein EJ; Shafii J Pediatrics; 2004 Sep; 114(3):729-35. PubMed ID: 15342846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Completeness of low anterior resection pathology report: a hospital-based audit with recommendations on improving reporting. Nambiar A; Vivek N; Bindu MR; Sudheer OV; Bai L Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 20448379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers. Rahi JS; Manaras I; Tuomainen H; Hundt GL Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):e477-82. PubMed ID: 15466074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cancer care critical pathways: implementing a successful program. Patton MD; Katterhagen JG Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Aug; 14(9):1-50. PubMed ID: 10151997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice. Shaller D Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):217-27. PubMed ID: 14702504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit. Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts. Zapka JG; Puleo E; Taplin S; Solberg LI; Mouchawar J; Somkin C; Geiger AM; Ulcickas Yood M J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):46-54. PubMed ID: 16287885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Variability in gross and microscopic pathology reporting in excisional biopsies of breast cancer tissue. Apple SK Breast J; 2006; 12(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16509839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists? Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. Neuss MN; Desch CE; McNiff KK; Eisenberg PD; Gesme DH; Jacobson JO; Jahanzeb M; Padberg JJ; Rainey JM; Guo JJ; Simone JV J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep; 23(25):6233-9. PubMed ID: 16087948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]