133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9372757)
1. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden.
Herberts P; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):44-60. PubMed ID: 9372757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases.
Herberts P; Malchau H
Acta Orthop Scand; 2000 Apr; 71(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 10852315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Many years of registration have improved the quality of hip arthroplasty].
Herberts P; Malchau H
Lakartidningen; 1999 May; 96(20):2469-73, 2475-6. PubMed ID: 10380492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.
Pedersen AB; Mehnert F; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Herberts P; Kärrholm J; Garellick G; Mäkela K; Eskelinen A; Overgaard S
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 May; 22(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 24631923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum 20-year follow-up results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.
Trumm BN; Callaghan JJ; George CA; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 23759117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
Varnum C
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.
Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Cnudde PH; Kärrholm J; Rolfson O; Timperley AJ; Mohaddes M
Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. PubMed ID: 28363891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revision total hip arthroplasty with cementing technique--five-year results.
Kinov P; Bukarev D; Dimov V; Kazakov K; Tivchev P
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2007; 72(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 18078285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening--a status assessment].
Wirtz DC; Niethard FU
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(4):270-80. PubMed ID: 9381761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
Sandiford NA; Jameson SS; Wilson MJ; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Revision arthroplasty in aseptic loosening of cemented sockets of hip prosthesis].
Gaździk TS; Wójcik B; Niedźwiedzki Ł; Dec J
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2002; 67(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 12148185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term aseptic loosening of the femoral component in canine total hip replacement: effects of cementing technique on cement mantle grade.
Ota J; Cook JL; Lewis DD; Tomlinson JL; Fox DB; Cook CR; Schultz LG; Brumitt J
Vet Surg; 2005; 34(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16212589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Predictive factors of aseptic loosening of cemented total hip prostheses].
Kochbati R; Rbai H; Jlailia M; Makhlouf H; Bouguira A; Daghfous MS
Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 24():260. PubMed ID: 27800113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
