69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9372764)
1. Options for primary femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. Cemented stems for all.
Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):118-23. PubMed ID: 9372764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide.
Dunbar MJ
Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cemented total hip arthroplasty: still relevant in the new millennium?
Iorio R; Kobayashi S
J South Orthop Assoc; 2003; 12(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 12882245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs.
D'Lima DD; Oishi CS; Petersilge WJ; Colwell CW; Walker RH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):140-8. PubMed ID: 9553546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current state of cement fixation in THR.
Morscher EW; Wirz D
Acta Orthop Belg; 2002 Feb; 68(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11915452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hot topics and controversies in arthroplasty: cementless femoral fixation in elderly patients.
Dutton A; Rubash HE
Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():255-9. PubMed ID: 18399588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fixation of the acetabular component. The case for cement.
Ranawat CS; Peters LE; Umlas ME
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):207-15. PubMed ID: 9372772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: state-of-the-art in the new millennium?
Reese A; Macaulay W
J South Orthop Assoc; 2003; 12(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 12882244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cement fixation of the femoral component in older patients.
Lachiewicz PF
Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():261-5. PubMed ID: 18399589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty in patients less than 35 years. Forty arthroplasties with 5-17 years follow-up.
Simon JP; Robbens E; Maes M; Bellemans J
Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Apr; 75(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 19492558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of surgical management of total HIP replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: cemented versus cementless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach.
Zimmerma S; Hawkes WG; Hudson JI; Magaziner J; Hebel JR; Towheed T; Gardner J; Provenzano G; Kenzora JE
J Orthop Res; 2002 Mar; 20(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 11918295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
Masár J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cemented versus uncemented hip replacement for fracture of the hip.
Hay M; Gottschalk F
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Sep 30-Oct 15; 27(18-19):1151-5. PubMed ID: 16278184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
